理性在叔本华伦理学中的作用

Sandra Shapshay
{"title":"理性在叔本华伦理学中的作用","authors":"Sandra Shapshay","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190906801.003.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter takes up the vexed role of reason in Schopenhauer’s thought with respect to his ethics. While explicitly demoting the faculty of reason in ethics from the lofty status it had enjoyed in Kant, this chapter shall argue that Schopenhauer nonetheless can and does retain several important roles for reason in politics and ethics. Highlighting these positive functions of reason will address some of the deficiencies of his discussion of compassion as the foundation of morality, and will help bring out the attractions of his view for contemporary normative ethical theorizing.","PeriodicalId":130585,"journal":{"name":"Reconstructing Schopenhauer's Ethics","volume":"185 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Role for Reason in Schopenhauer’s Ethics\",\"authors\":\"Sandra Shapshay\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780190906801.003.0006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter takes up the vexed role of reason in Schopenhauer’s thought with respect to his ethics. While explicitly demoting the faculty of reason in ethics from the lofty status it had enjoyed in Kant, this chapter shall argue that Schopenhauer nonetheless can and does retain several important roles for reason in politics and ethics. Highlighting these positive functions of reason will address some of the deficiencies of his discussion of compassion as the foundation of morality, and will help bring out the attractions of his view for contemporary normative ethical theorizing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":130585,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reconstructing Schopenhauer's Ethics\",\"volume\":\"185 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reconstructing Schopenhauer's Ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190906801.003.0006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reconstructing Schopenhauer's Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190906801.003.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章从叔本华的伦理学思想出发,探讨理性在叔本华思想中所扮演的令人烦恼的角色。虽然明确地将理性在伦理学中的地位从康德所享有的崇高地位中降级,但本章将论证叔本华仍然可以并且确实保留了理性在政治和伦理学中的几个重要角色。强调理性的这些积极功能将解决他将同情心作为道德基础的讨论中的一些缺陷,并将有助于揭示他的观点对当代规范伦理理论化的吸引力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Role for Reason in Schopenhauer’s Ethics
This chapter takes up the vexed role of reason in Schopenhauer’s thought with respect to his ethics. While explicitly demoting the faculty of reason in ethics from the lofty status it had enjoyed in Kant, this chapter shall argue that Schopenhauer nonetheless can and does retain several important roles for reason in politics and ethics. Highlighting these positive functions of reason will address some of the deficiencies of his discussion of compassion as the foundation of morality, and will help bring out the attractions of his view for contemporary normative ethical theorizing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Role for Reason in Schopenhauer’s Ethics A Tale of Two Schopenhauers Schopenhauer’s Pessimism in Light of His Evolving System Freedom and Morality Compassionate Moral Realism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1