从hoare风格的验证尝试中以单元测试的形式生成反例

Amirfarhad Nilizadeh, Marlon Calvo, Gary T. Leavens, D. Cok
{"title":"从hoare风格的验证尝试中以单元测试的形式生成反例","authors":"Amirfarhad Nilizadeh, Marlon Calvo, Gary T. Leavens, D. Cok","doi":"10.1145/3524482.3527656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Unit tests that demonstrate why a program is incorrect have many potential uses, including localizing bugs (i.e., showing where code is wrong), improving test suites, and better code synthesis. However, counterexamples produced by failed attempts at Hoare-style verification (e.g., by SMT solvers) are difficult to translate into unit tests. We explain how to generate unit tests from counterexamples generated by an SMT solver and how this process could be embodied in a prototype tool. This process combines static verification techniques and runtime assertion checking.","PeriodicalId":119264,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE/ACM 10th International Conference on Formal Methods in Software Engineering (FormaliSE)","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Generating Counterexamples in the form of Unit Tests from Hoare-style Verification Attempts\",\"authors\":\"Amirfarhad Nilizadeh, Marlon Calvo, Gary T. Leavens, D. Cok\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3524482.3527656\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Unit tests that demonstrate why a program is incorrect have many potential uses, including localizing bugs (i.e., showing where code is wrong), improving test suites, and better code synthesis. However, counterexamples produced by failed attempts at Hoare-style verification (e.g., by SMT solvers) are difficult to translate into unit tests. We explain how to generate unit tests from counterexamples generated by an SMT solver and how this process could be embodied in a prototype tool. This process combines static verification techniques and runtime assertion checking.\",\"PeriodicalId\":119264,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 IEEE/ACM 10th International Conference on Formal Methods in Software Engineering (FormaliSE)\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 IEEE/ACM 10th International Conference on Formal Methods in Software Engineering (FormaliSE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3524482.3527656\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE/ACM 10th International Conference on Formal Methods in Software Engineering (FormaliSE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3524482.3527656","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

证明程序为什么不正确的单元测试有许多潜在的用途,包括定位错误(即,显示代码错误的地方),改进测试套件,以及更好的代码合成。然而,在Hoare-style验证(例如,SMT求解器)中失败的尝试所产生的反例很难转化为单元测试。我们解释了如何从SMT求解器生成的反例中生成单元测试,以及如何将此过程体现在原型工具中。这个过程结合了静态验证技术和运行时断言检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Generating Counterexamples in the form of Unit Tests from Hoare-style Verification Attempts
Unit tests that demonstrate why a program is incorrect have many potential uses, including localizing bugs (i.e., showing where code is wrong), improving test suites, and better code synthesis. However, counterexamples produced by failed attempts at Hoare-style verification (e.g., by SMT solvers) are difficult to translate into unit tests. We explain how to generate unit tests from counterexamples generated by an SMT solver and how this process could be embodied in a prototype tool. This process combines static verification techniques and runtime assertion checking.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Counterexample-Guided Inductive Repair of Reactive Contracts Towards Automated Input Generation for Sketching Alloy Models Computing Program Functions C for Yourself: Comparison of Front-End Techniques for Formal Verification Automatic Loop Invariant Generation for Data Dependence Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1