捉迷藏:贷方如何应对消费者保护

Youssef Benzarti
{"title":"捉迷藏:贷方如何应对消费者保护","authors":"Youssef Benzarti","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3459226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper uses the universe of mortgage contracts along with a quasi-experimental design to estimate the response of high-interest lenders to borrower protection regulations aimed at simplifying and making loan terms more transparent. We find that lenders substantially reduce interest rates, by an average of 10%, in order to avoid being subject to consumer protection, without reducing amounts lent nor the number of loans originated. This finding implies that high interest lenders prefer the ability to issue obfuscatory mortgage contracts to mortgages with higher interest rates and is consistent with the model of Gabaix & Laibson (2006), which shows that firms may not educate consumers if sufficiently many consumers are inattentive.","PeriodicalId":196559,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Consumer Credit Issues (Sub-Topic)","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Playing Hide and Seek: How Lenders Respond to Consumer Protection\",\"authors\":\"Youssef Benzarti\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3459226\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper uses the universe of mortgage contracts along with a quasi-experimental design to estimate the response of high-interest lenders to borrower protection regulations aimed at simplifying and making loan terms more transparent. We find that lenders substantially reduce interest rates, by an average of 10%, in order to avoid being subject to consumer protection, without reducing amounts lent nor the number of loans originated. This finding implies that high interest lenders prefer the ability to issue obfuscatory mortgage contracts to mortgages with higher interest rates and is consistent with the model of Gabaix & Laibson (2006), which shows that firms may not educate consumers if sufficiently many consumers are inattentive.\",\"PeriodicalId\":196559,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LSN: Consumer Credit Issues (Sub-Topic)\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LSN: Consumer Credit Issues (Sub-Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3459226\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Consumer Credit Issues (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3459226","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文使用抵押合同的范围以及准实验设计来估计高息贷款人对旨在简化和使贷款条款更加透明的借款人保护法规的反应。我们发现,为了避免受到消费者保护,贷款人大幅降低利率,平均降低10%,而没有减少贷款金额或贷款数量。这一发现表明,比起高利率的抵押贷款,高利率贷款人更倾向于发行模糊的抵押贷款合同,这与Gabaix &Laibson(2006),这表明如果足够多的消费者不注意,企业可能不会教育消费者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Playing Hide and Seek: How Lenders Respond to Consumer Protection
This paper uses the universe of mortgage contracts along with a quasi-experimental design to estimate the response of high-interest lenders to borrower protection regulations aimed at simplifying and making loan terms more transparent. We find that lenders substantially reduce interest rates, by an average of 10%, in order to avoid being subject to consumer protection, without reducing amounts lent nor the number of loans originated. This finding implies that high interest lenders prefer the ability to issue obfuscatory mortgage contracts to mortgages with higher interest rates and is consistent with the model of Gabaix & Laibson (2006), which shows that firms may not educate consumers if sufficiently many consumers are inattentive.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Credit Access and Mobility during the Flint Water Crisis American Student Loans: Repayment and Valuation Is the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive Fit to Effectively Tackle Abusive Debt Collection? A Critical Evaluation Fintech Lenders’ Responses to Senate Probe Heighten Fears of Educational Redlining PLUS Borrowing in Texas: Repayment Expectations, Experience, and Hindsight by Minority-Serving Institution Status
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1