人类和算法在PaSC人脸识别挑战中的表现

P. Phillips, Matthew Q. Hill, Jake A. Swindle, A. O’Toole
{"title":"人类和算法在PaSC人脸识别挑战中的表现","authors":"P. Phillips, Matthew Q. Hill, Jake A. Swindle, A. O’Toole","doi":"10.1109/BTAS.2015.7358765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Face recognition by machines has improved substantially in the past decade and now is at a level that compares favorably with humans for frontal faces acquired by digital single lens reflex cameras. We expand the comparison between humans and algorithms to still images and videos taken with digital point and shoot cameras. The data used for this comparison are from the Point and Shoot Face Recognition Challenge (PaSC). For videos, human performance was compared with the four top performers in the Face and Gesture 2015 Person Recognition Evaluation. In the literature, there are two methods for computing human performance: aggregation and fusion. We show that the fusion method produces higher performance estimates. We report performance for two levels of difficulty: challenging and extremely-difficult. Our results provide additional evidence that human performance shines relative to algorithms on extremely-difficult comparisons. To improve the community's understanding of the state of human and algorithm performance, we update the cross-modal performance analysis in Phillips and O'Toole [22] with these new results.","PeriodicalId":404972,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE 7th International Conference on Biometrics Theory, Applications and Systems (BTAS)","volume":"98 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Human and algorithm performance on the PaSC face Recognition Challenge\",\"authors\":\"P. Phillips, Matthew Q. Hill, Jake A. Swindle, A. O’Toole\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/BTAS.2015.7358765\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Face recognition by machines has improved substantially in the past decade and now is at a level that compares favorably with humans for frontal faces acquired by digital single lens reflex cameras. We expand the comparison between humans and algorithms to still images and videos taken with digital point and shoot cameras. The data used for this comparison are from the Point and Shoot Face Recognition Challenge (PaSC). For videos, human performance was compared with the four top performers in the Face and Gesture 2015 Person Recognition Evaluation. In the literature, there are two methods for computing human performance: aggregation and fusion. We show that the fusion method produces higher performance estimates. We report performance for two levels of difficulty: challenging and extremely-difficult. Our results provide additional evidence that human performance shines relative to algorithms on extremely-difficult comparisons. To improve the community's understanding of the state of human and algorithm performance, we update the cross-modal performance analysis in Phillips and O'Toole [22] with these new results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":404972,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 IEEE 7th International Conference on Biometrics Theory, Applications and Systems (BTAS)\",\"volume\":\"98 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 IEEE 7th International Conference on Biometrics Theory, Applications and Systems (BTAS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/BTAS.2015.7358765\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE 7th International Conference on Biometrics Theory, Applications and Systems (BTAS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BTAS.2015.7358765","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

摘要

在过去的十年里,机器的面部识别已经有了很大的进步,现在已经达到了与人类相比的水平,可以通过数码单镜头反光相机获得正面的面部。我们将人与算法之间的比较扩展到用数码相机拍摄的静态图像和视频。用于比较的数据来自Point and Shoot Face Recognition Challenge (PaSC)。对于视频,人类的表现与2015年人脸和手势识别评估中的前四名表现最好的人进行了比较。在文献中,有两种计算人类表现的方法:聚合和融合。我们表明,融合方法产生更高的性能估计。我们根据两个难度等级来报告游戏表现:具有挑战性的和极难的。我们的研究结果提供了额外的证据,证明在极其困难的比较中,人类的表现相对于算法更出色。为了提高社区对人和算法性能状态的理解,我们用这些新结果更新了Phillips和O'Toole[22]的跨模态性能分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Human and algorithm performance on the PaSC face Recognition Challenge
Face recognition by machines has improved substantially in the past decade and now is at a level that compares favorably with humans for frontal faces acquired by digital single lens reflex cameras. We expand the comparison between humans and algorithms to still images and videos taken with digital point and shoot cameras. The data used for this comparison are from the Point and Shoot Face Recognition Challenge (PaSC). For videos, human performance was compared with the four top performers in the Face and Gesture 2015 Person Recognition Evaluation. In the literature, there are two methods for computing human performance: aggregation and fusion. We show that the fusion method produces higher performance estimates. We report performance for two levels of difficulty: challenging and extremely-difficult. Our results provide additional evidence that human performance shines relative to algorithms on extremely-difficult comparisons. To improve the community's understanding of the state of human and algorithm performance, we update the cross-modal performance analysis in Phillips and O'Toole [22] with these new results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Towards fitting a 3D dense facial model to a 2D image: A landmark-free approach Combining 3D and 2D for less constrained periocular recognition Pace independent mobile gait biometrics Iris imaging in visible spectrum using white LED On smartphone camera based fingerphoto authentication
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1