中国正义的权力逻辑

Ji Li
{"title":"中国正义的权力逻辑","authors":"Ji Li","doi":"10.1093/AJCL/AVX012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The vast literature on judicial behavior in China has generated valuable insights, yet huge gaps remain open. Lacking in particular is a coherent and trans-substantive analytical framework that can demystify the complex and elusive boundary between Chinese law and politics and explain major post-filing actions of a Chinese court, i.e., what the court does regarding its jurisdiction, which dispute resolution method it prefers (mediation versus adjudication), to what extent it applies the law fairly, how it exercises its discretion in adjudication, and how it subsequently enforces the judgment. Behind all these components of judicial behavior, I contend, lies a coherent power logic. This Article articulates that logic by presenting a unified positive theory of nuanced power distribution.","PeriodicalId":356075,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Law eJournal","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Power Logic of Justice in China\",\"authors\":\"Ji Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/AJCL/AVX012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The vast literature on judicial behavior in China has generated valuable insights, yet huge gaps remain open. Lacking in particular is a coherent and trans-substantive analytical framework that can demystify the complex and elusive boundary between Chinese law and politics and explain major post-filing actions of a Chinese court, i.e., what the court does regarding its jurisdiction, which dispute resolution method it prefers (mediation versus adjudication), to what extent it applies the law fairly, how it exercises its discretion in adjudication, and how it subsequently enforces the judgment. Behind all these components of judicial behavior, I contend, lies a coherent power logic. This Article articulates that logic by presenting a unified positive theory of nuanced power distribution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":356075,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Law eJournal\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Law eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/AJCL/AVX012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/AJCL/AVX012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

关于中国司法行为的大量文献提供了宝贵的见解,但仍存在巨大的空白。尤其缺乏一个连贯的、跨实体的分析框架,以澄清中国法律与政治之间复杂而难以捉摸的界限,并解释中国法院的主要诉后行为,即法院在其管辖权方面做些什么,它更喜欢哪种争议解决方法(调解还是裁决),它在多大程度上公平地适用法律,它如何在裁决中行使自由裁量权,以及它随后如何执行判决。我认为,在司法行为的所有这些组成部分背后,存在着一种连贯的权力逻辑。本文通过提出一种统一的实证理论来阐明这一逻辑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Power Logic of Justice in China
The vast literature on judicial behavior in China has generated valuable insights, yet huge gaps remain open. Lacking in particular is a coherent and trans-substantive analytical framework that can demystify the complex and elusive boundary between Chinese law and politics and explain major post-filing actions of a Chinese court, i.e., what the court does regarding its jurisdiction, which dispute resolution method it prefers (mediation versus adjudication), to what extent it applies the law fairly, how it exercises its discretion in adjudication, and how it subsequently enforces the judgment. Behind all these components of judicial behavior, I contend, lies a coherent power logic. This Article articulates that logic by presenting a unified positive theory of nuanced power distribution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Better Model for Australia’s Enhanced FinTech Sandbox The Impact of Foreign Slowdown on the U.S. Economy: An Open Economy DSGE Perspective Explaining the Limits of the WTO in Shaping the Rule of Law in China Economic Development through Migration - Facilitating Skilled Migration to China through the Belt and Road Initiative The Chinese (Taiwan) Yearbook of International Law and Affairs: Contributing to the Grotian Moment in Asia:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1