正畸托槽脱粘后不同方法的体内可行性研究

Juhi Yadav, Madhulika Yadav, Danish U. Z. Khan, N. Grover
{"title":"正畸托槽脱粘后不同方法的体内可行性研究","authors":"Juhi Yadav, Madhulika Yadav, Danish U. Z. Khan, N. Grover","doi":"10.9734/bpi/nfmmr/v1/3255f","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The objective of this study is to evaluate and compare the levels of discomfort thorough Visual analogue scale (VAS) experienced during debonding using three different methods, as well as the adhesive remnant index (ARI) scores. \nMaterials and Methods: 50 female patients from a single clinic were studied in the study, with a mean age of 24 years and 5 months. Lift-off debonding instrument, straight cutter and Howe plier were the three methods used to study during debonding of orthodontic appliances. Discomfort levels were measured using a visual analogue scale at the end of debonding in each quadrant (VAS). ARI was used to investigate the remaining adhesive on the enamel surface. \nResults: The Straight cutter technique resulted in much greater pain scores. The Lift off debonding instrument method was the least discomfort causing method .The three approaches utilised by ARI yielded significantly varied findings. \nConclusion: When the Lift off debonding instrument method was utilised, the patients showed the least amount of discomfort.","PeriodicalId":360142,"journal":{"name":"New Frontiers in Medicine and Medical Research Vol. 1","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An in vivo Study of the Feasibility of Different Methods after Debonding of Orthodontic Brackets\",\"authors\":\"Juhi Yadav, Madhulika Yadav, Danish U. Z. Khan, N. Grover\",\"doi\":\"10.9734/bpi/nfmmr/v1/3255f\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: The objective of this study is to evaluate and compare the levels of discomfort thorough Visual analogue scale (VAS) experienced during debonding using three different methods, as well as the adhesive remnant index (ARI) scores. \\nMaterials and Methods: 50 female patients from a single clinic were studied in the study, with a mean age of 24 years and 5 months. Lift-off debonding instrument, straight cutter and Howe plier were the three methods used to study during debonding of orthodontic appliances. Discomfort levels were measured using a visual analogue scale at the end of debonding in each quadrant (VAS). ARI was used to investigate the remaining adhesive on the enamel surface. \\nResults: The Straight cutter technique resulted in much greater pain scores. The Lift off debonding instrument method was the least discomfort causing method .The three approaches utilised by ARI yielded significantly varied findings. \\nConclusion: When the Lift off debonding instrument method was utilised, the patients showed the least amount of discomfort.\",\"PeriodicalId\":360142,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Frontiers in Medicine and Medical Research Vol. 1\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Frontiers in Medicine and Medical Research Vol. 1\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/nfmmr/v1/3255f\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Frontiers in Medicine and Medical Research Vol. 1","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/nfmmr/v1/3255f","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估和比较三种不同方法在脱粘过程中所经历的不适程度,以及粘接剂残留指数(ARI)评分。材料与方法:选取单诊所女性患者50例,平均年龄24岁5个月。在正畸矫治器脱粘过程中,采用升降式脱粘仪、直刀和豪钳三种方法进行研究。在每个象限(VAS)的剥离结束时,使用视觉模拟量表测量不适程度。用ARI法观察牙釉质表面残留的粘接剂。结果:直刀技术使疼痛评分更高。Lift off脱粘器械法是引起不适最少的方法。ARI采用的三种方法产生了显著不同的结果。结论:采用Lift off脱粘器械法时,患者的不适最小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An in vivo Study of the Feasibility of Different Methods after Debonding of Orthodontic Brackets
Aim: The objective of this study is to evaluate and compare the levels of discomfort thorough Visual analogue scale (VAS) experienced during debonding using three different methods, as well as the adhesive remnant index (ARI) scores. Materials and Methods: 50 female patients from a single clinic were studied in the study, with a mean age of 24 years and 5 months. Lift-off debonding instrument, straight cutter and Howe plier were the three methods used to study during debonding of orthodontic appliances. Discomfort levels were measured using a visual analogue scale at the end of debonding in each quadrant (VAS). ARI was used to investigate the remaining adhesive on the enamel surface. Results: The Straight cutter technique resulted in much greater pain scores. The Lift off debonding instrument method was the least discomfort causing method .The three approaches utilised by ARI yielded significantly varied findings. Conclusion: When the Lift off debonding instrument method was utilised, the patients showed the least amount of discomfort.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Brief Study on Rectus Sheath Hematoma Study on Association of Serum Uric Acid, Homocystine and Ferritin among Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Patients in Bangladesh A Rare Case Report of Acute T-cell Lymphoblastic Leukaemia Presenting with Cutaneous Involvement in a Child Study of Fibroepithelial Lesions of Breast at a tertiary Care Centre- an Audit, Clinicopathological APPROACH and Comparison with WHO Grading A Review on Brain Metastases Prognostic Scoring Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1