{"title":"对试件的测试结果进行评估","authors":"D. Vié, O. Poupard","doi":"10.1080/17747120.2007.9692922","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT To help comparisons with model results, the present paper gives qualitative analysis of experimental results. Main beams configuration datas and material properties after 40 years are remembered. Experimental analysis is focused on initial elastic behaviour, ultimate beam capacity and rigidity evolution during cyclic tests. Difficulties about crack monitoring are pointed out.","PeriodicalId":368904,"journal":{"name":"Revue Européenne de Génie Civil","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bilan des essais sur corps d'épreuve\",\"authors\":\"D. Vié, O. Poupard\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17747120.2007.9692922\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT To help comparisons with model results, the present paper gives qualitative analysis of experimental results. Main beams configuration datas and material properties after 40 years are remembered. Experimental analysis is focused on initial elastic behaviour, ultimate beam capacity and rigidity evolution during cyclic tests. Difficulties about crack monitoring are pointed out.\",\"PeriodicalId\":368904,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revue Européenne de Génie Civil\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revue Européenne de Génie Civil\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17747120.2007.9692922\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revue Européenne de Génie Civil","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17747120.2007.9692922","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
ABSTRACT To help comparisons with model results, the present paper gives qualitative analysis of experimental results. Main beams configuration datas and material properties after 40 years are remembered. Experimental analysis is focused on initial elastic behaviour, ultimate beam capacity and rigidity evolution during cyclic tests. Difficulties about crack monitoring are pointed out.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
