确定马来西亚历史建筑适应性再利用中历史建筑内部的指导方针和限制

Isma Adleena Abdul Azis, Khairul Anwar Mohamed khaidzir, Aiman Mohd Rashid
{"title":"确定马来西亚历史建筑适应性再利用中历史建筑内部的指导方针和限制","authors":"Isma Adleena Abdul Azis, Khairul Anwar Mohamed khaidzir, Aiman Mohd Rashid","doi":"10.35631/jthem.727006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Adaptive re-use in heritage buildings is perceived as a viable alternative in restoring the existing building to accommodate for new or continued building use while addressing its heritage agenda. In the conservation approach of adaptive re-use, new interventions of historic interiors are often subject to insensible alteration particularly in its interior design outcome resulting in compromised heritage representation in Malaysia. The government’s efforts to protect and manage historic buildings are illustrated by the implementation of the National Heritage Act 2005 and the Historic Building Conservation Guidelines 2016. However, there are insufficient guidance concerning new interior design works of a historic interior within Malaysia. The primary aim of this paper is to identify the current limitation of the Historic Building Conservation Guidelines in Malaysia pertaining to historic interior works and to contribute to the discussion surrounding this matter. The paper presents comparative analysis and interpretation of literature and grey documents (guidelines and policies) in adaptive re-use of heritage buildings in Malaysia. The data generated is compared with similar conservation approach guidelines from England and United States of America. The analysis revealed that the Historic Building Conservation Guidelines is a comprehensive document that underscores physical action to preserve the fabric and materials of heritage buildings. However, while the broad definitions for new design proposal to be sympathetic and visual appropriateness to the existing building character are acceptable, it may lead to unintended interpretation and consequences. The paper suggests that the existing guideline need to be accompanied with additional guidance to aid practitioners especially architects and interior designers in dealing with historic interior using the comparative analysis with goals to intensify the value of historic interior that involves new intervention.","PeriodicalId":235421,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Tourism, Hospitality and Environment Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"IDENTIFYING GUIDELINES LIMITATION OF HISTORIC INTERIOR IN ADAPTIVE RE-USE OF HERITAGE BUILDING IN MALAYSIA\",\"authors\":\"Isma Adleena Abdul Azis, Khairul Anwar Mohamed khaidzir, Aiman Mohd Rashid\",\"doi\":\"10.35631/jthem.727006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Adaptive re-use in heritage buildings is perceived as a viable alternative in restoring the existing building to accommodate for new or continued building use while addressing its heritage agenda. In the conservation approach of adaptive re-use, new interventions of historic interiors are often subject to insensible alteration particularly in its interior design outcome resulting in compromised heritage representation in Malaysia. The government’s efforts to protect and manage historic buildings are illustrated by the implementation of the National Heritage Act 2005 and the Historic Building Conservation Guidelines 2016. However, there are insufficient guidance concerning new interior design works of a historic interior within Malaysia. The primary aim of this paper is to identify the current limitation of the Historic Building Conservation Guidelines in Malaysia pertaining to historic interior works and to contribute to the discussion surrounding this matter. The paper presents comparative analysis and interpretation of literature and grey documents (guidelines and policies) in adaptive re-use of heritage buildings in Malaysia. The data generated is compared with similar conservation approach guidelines from England and United States of America. The analysis revealed that the Historic Building Conservation Guidelines is a comprehensive document that underscores physical action to preserve the fabric and materials of heritage buildings. However, while the broad definitions for new design proposal to be sympathetic and visual appropriateness to the existing building character are acceptable, it may lead to unintended interpretation and consequences. The paper suggests that the existing guideline need to be accompanied with additional guidance to aid practitioners especially architects and interior designers in dealing with historic interior using the comparative analysis with goals to intensify the value of historic interior that involves new intervention.\",\"PeriodicalId\":235421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Tourism, Hospitality and Environment Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Tourism, Hospitality and Environment Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35631/jthem.727006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Tourism, Hospitality and Environment Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35631/jthem.727006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

文物建筑的适应性再利用被认为是修复现有建筑以适应新的或持续的建筑使用,同时解决其遗产议程的可行选择。在适应性再利用的保护方法中,历史室内的新干预经常受到无意识的改变,特别是在其室内设计结果中,导致马来西亚的遗产代表受到损害。2005年《国家遗产法》和2016年《历史建筑保护指南》的实施说明了政府在保护和管理历史建筑方面所做的努力。然而,对于马来西亚历史悠久的室内建筑的新室内设计工作,缺乏足够的指导。本文的主要目的是确定马来西亚历史建筑保护指南目前在历史室内工程方面的局限性,并为围绕这一问题的讨论做出贡献。本文对马来西亚历史建筑适应性再利用的文献和灰色文件(指导方针和政策)进行了比较分析和解释。所产生的数据与英国和美国类似的保护方针进行了比较。分析显示,《历史建筑保护指引》是一份全面的文件,强调采取实际行动保护历史建筑的结构和材料。然而,虽然新设计方案的广泛定义是可以接受的,但它可能会导致意想不到的解释和后果。本文建议,现有的指导方针需要与额外的指导相结合,以帮助从业者,特别是建筑师和室内设计师,在处理历史室内设计时,使用有目标的比较分析,以加强涉及新干预的历史室内设计的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
IDENTIFYING GUIDELINES LIMITATION OF HISTORIC INTERIOR IN ADAPTIVE RE-USE OF HERITAGE BUILDING IN MALAYSIA
Adaptive re-use in heritage buildings is perceived as a viable alternative in restoring the existing building to accommodate for new or continued building use while addressing its heritage agenda. In the conservation approach of adaptive re-use, new interventions of historic interiors are often subject to insensible alteration particularly in its interior design outcome resulting in compromised heritage representation in Malaysia. The government’s efforts to protect and manage historic buildings are illustrated by the implementation of the National Heritage Act 2005 and the Historic Building Conservation Guidelines 2016. However, there are insufficient guidance concerning new interior design works of a historic interior within Malaysia. The primary aim of this paper is to identify the current limitation of the Historic Building Conservation Guidelines in Malaysia pertaining to historic interior works and to contribute to the discussion surrounding this matter. The paper presents comparative analysis and interpretation of literature and grey documents (guidelines and policies) in adaptive re-use of heritage buildings in Malaysia. The data generated is compared with similar conservation approach guidelines from England and United States of America. The analysis revealed that the Historic Building Conservation Guidelines is a comprehensive document that underscores physical action to preserve the fabric and materials of heritage buildings. However, while the broad definitions for new design proposal to be sympathetic and visual appropriateness to the existing building character are acceptable, it may lead to unintended interpretation and consequences. The paper suggests that the existing guideline need to be accompanied with additional guidance to aid practitioners especially architects and interior designers in dealing with historic interior using the comparative analysis with goals to intensify the value of historic interior that involves new intervention.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
RESIDENT’S PERCEPTION OF HERITAGE-BASED TOURIST ATTRACTIONS IN KUALA TERENGGANU THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN RECYCLING BEHAVIOUR AND ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY IN HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTION EFFECT OF EMOTIONAL DISPLAY RULES ON FUNCTIONALITY SATISFACTION OF TOURISM COMPANIES MANAGEMENT IN IRAQ: THE MODERATING EFFECT OF EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE REDUCING CARBON EMISSION THROUGH CARBON TAX POLICY IN MALAYSIA A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF INTENTION TO STAY IN A HOTEL USING VOSVIEWER
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1