维护公共利益:香港的经验

P. Law, Trevor T W Wan
{"title":"维护公共利益:香港的经验","authors":"P. Law, Trevor T W Wan","doi":"10.1080/10854681.2022.2096329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"1. Hong Kong, once hailed as a ‘liberal enclave’ located at the periphery of China, is known for its vibrant common law tradition and civic-minded citizenry that regularly ‘mobilize on shared constitutional meanings to resist perceived regime malfeasance’. Through lodging judicial review applications in the name of ‘public interest’, organisations and individuals move to combat administrative and constitutional injustice in the judicial fora. Nevertheless, noble though their causes might be, these public-spirited litigants must first surmount one jurisdictional hurdle before their applications can proceed – they must convince the courts that they have the requisite standing to bring the action. Toborrow the term coinedby Cane, they have to show ‘public interest standing’. While public interest standing is no novel concept to the law, its contours and operation continue to attract discussions and scepticism among judges, scholars and practitioners, catalysing the emergence of a sizeable corpus of case law across common law jurisdictions.","PeriodicalId":232228,"journal":{"name":"Judicial Review","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Standing Up for Public Interest Standing: The Hong Kong Experience\",\"authors\":\"P. Law, Trevor T W Wan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10854681.2022.2096329\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"1. Hong Kong, once hailed as a ‘liberal enclave’ located at the periphery of China, is known for its vibrant common law tradition and civic-minded citizenry that regularly ‘mobilize on shared constitutional meanings to resist perceived regime malfeasance’. Through lodging judicial review applications in the name of ‘public interest’, organisations and individuals move to combat administrative and constitutional injustice in the judicial fora. Nevertheless, noble though their causes might be, these public-spirited litigants must first surmount one jurisdictional hurdle before their applications can proceed – they must convince the courts that they have the requisite standing to bring the action. Toborrow the term coinedby Cane, they have to show ‘public interest standing’. While public interest standing is no novel concept to the law, its contours and operation continue to attract discussions and scepticism among judges, scholars and practitioners, catalysing the emergence of a sizeable corpus of case law across common law jurisdictions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":232228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Judicial Review\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Judicial Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2022.2096329\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Judicial Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2022.2096329","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1. 香港曾被誉为位于中国外围的“自由飞地”,以其充满活力的普通法传统和具有公民意识的公民而闻名,他们经常“根据共同的宪法意义动员起来,抵制被认为是政权渎职的行为”。团体和个人以“公众利益”的名义提出司法覆核申请,在司法法庭上对抗行政和宪制上的不公正。然而,尽管他们的理由可能是高尚的,这些有公益精神的诉讼当事人必须首先克服一个司法障碍,然后他们的申请才能进行——他们必须说服法院,他们有必要提起诉讼。借用凯恩创造的术语,他们必须表现出“公共利益立场”。虽然公共利益地位对法律来说并不是一个新概念,但它的轮廓和运作继续引起法官、学者和实践者的讨论和怀疑,促使在普通法司法管辖区出现了大量的判例法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Standing Up for Public Interest Standing: The Hong Kong Experience
1. Hong Kong, once hailed as a ‘liberal enclave’ located at the periphery of China, is known for its vibrant common law tradition and civic-minded citizenry that regularly ‘mobilize on shared constitutional meanings to resist perceived regime malfeasance’. Through lodging judicial review applications in the name of ‘public interest’, organisations and individuals move to combat administrative and constitutional injustice in the judicial fora. Nevertheless, noble though their causes might be, these public-spirited litigants must first surmount one jurisdictional hurdle before their applications can proceed – they must convince the courts that they have the requisite standing to bring the action. Toborrow the term coinedby Cane, they have to show ‘public interest standing’. While public interest standing is no novel concept to the law, its contours and operation continue to attract discussions and scepticism among judges, scholars and practitioners, catalysing the emergence of a sizeable corpus of case law across common law jurisdictions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Article 2 and Standards of Proof in Inquests: Unintelligible, Unclear, and Unpredictable? Of Codes and Common Law: The Approach to Apparent Bias in Local Government Committees Competing ‘Clear and Unambiguous’ Constructions: Darwall v Dartmoor National Park Authority [2023] EWCA Civ 927 and the Interpretation of Private Acts of Parliament The Curious Case of Boris’ Bishop: Did the First Catholic Prime Minister Fall Foul of s 18 of the Roman Catholic Relief Act 1829? Information Law and Automated Governance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1