{"title":"2019年使用XX日立药房的计卡绩效评估","authors":"Ahmad Suriyadi Muslim, Titik Sunarni, T. Andayani","doi":"10.30989/mik.v9i2.349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The growth rate of pharmacy in the city of Yogyakarta is very rapid so that it can cause competition between pharmacy. \nObjective: Pharmacy service performance is very important to be reviewed because it can be used as a parameter to determine management strategies. One method that is recommended in assessing pharmacy performance is the balanced scorecard method. \nMethods: This research is non-experimental explorative descriptive design with the aim to find out the performance of the apotek XX Yogyakarta based on four perspectives of the balanced scorecard method, financial side, customer, internal business processes, learning and growth of pharmacy and provide recommendations for improvement based on the results of the performance evaluation. Data collection was conducted retrospectively and prospectively in the form of qualitative and quantitative data. \nResults: The results of the performance apotek XX Yogyakarta using the balanced scorecard method research from a financial perspective shows the value of ITOR has decreased every year, Internal business process perspective is still found the existence of DRP and pharmacies have not met 100% of drug needs and in the perspective of learning and employee productivity growth is valued less. \nConclusion: However, over all the results are good because it meets the standard values.","PeriodicalId":340508,"journal":{"name":"MEDIA ILMU KESEHATAN","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EVALUASI KINERJA MENGGUNAKAN METODE BALANCED SCORECARD PADA APOTEK XX YOGYAKARTA TAHUN 2019\",\"authors\":\"Ahmad Suriyadi Muslim, Titik Sunarni, T. Andayani\",\"doi\":\"10.30989/mik.v9i2.349\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The growth rate of pharmacy in the city of Yogyakarta is very rapid so that it can cause competition between pharmacy. \\nObjective: Pharmacy service performance is very important to be reviewed because it can be used as a parameter to determine management strategies. One method that is recommended in assessing pharmacy performance is the balanced scorecard method. \\nMethods: This research is non-experimental explorative descriptive design with the aim to find out the performance of the apotek XX Yogyakarta based on four perspectives of the balanced scorecard method, financial side, customer, internal business processes, learning and growth of pharmacy and provide recommendations for improvement based on the results of the performance evaluation. Data collection was conducted retrospectively and prospectively in the form of qualitative and quantitative data. \\nResults: The results of the performance apotek XX Yogyakarta using the balanced scorecard method research from a financial perspective shows the value of ITOR has decreased every year, Internal business process perspective is still found the existence of DRP and pharmacies have not met 100% of drug needs and in the perspective of learning and employee productivity growth is valued less. \\nConclusion: However, over all the results are good because it meets the standard values.\",\"PeriodicalId\":340508,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MEDIA ILMU KESEHATAN\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MEDIA ILMU KESEHATAN\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30989/mik.v9i2.349\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MEDIA ILMU KESEHATAN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30989/mik.v9i2.349","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
背景:日惹市药房的增长速度非常快,因此会引起药店之间的竞争。目的:评价药房的服务绩效是制定管理策略的重要依据。一种方法,被推荐在评估药房绩效是平衡计分卡方法。方法:本研究采用非实验探索性描述性设计,旨在从平衡计分卡法、财务面、客户面、内部业务流程、药房学习与成长四个角度,了解apotek XX日惹药房的绩效,并根据绩效评估结果提出改进建议。以定性和定量数据的形式进行回顾性和前瞻性数据收集。结果:对apotek XX Yogyakarta绩效运用平衡计分卡方法进行财务角度研究的结果显示,ITOR的价值每年都在下降,内部业务流程角度仍然发现DRP的存在和药房没有100%满足药品需求,在学习和员工生产力增长的角度被认为价值较低。结论:总体效果良好,符合标准值。
EVALUASI KINERJA MENGGUNAKAN METODE BALANCED SCORECARD PADA APOTEK XX YOGYAKARTA TAHUN 2019
Background: The growth rate of pharmacy in the city of Yogyakarta is very rapid so that it can cause competition between pharmacy.
Objective: Pharmacy service performance is very important to be reviewed because it can be used as a parameter to determine management strategies. One method that is recommended in assessing pharmacy performance is the balanced scorecard method.
Methods: This research is non-experimental explorative descriptive design with the aim to find out the performance of the apotek XX Yogyakarta based on four perspectives of the balanced scorecard method, financial side, customer, internal business processes, learning and growth of pharmacy and provide recommendations for improvement based on the results of the performance evaluation. Data collection was conducted retrospectively and prospectively in the form of qualitative and quantitative data.
Results: The results of the performance apotek XX Yogyakarta using the balanced scorecard method research from a financial perspective shows the value of ITOR has decreased every year, Internal business process perspective is still found the existence of DRP and pharmacies have not met 100% of drug needs and in the perspective of learning and employee productivity growth is valued less.
Conclusion: However, over all the results are good because it meets the standard values.