意大利投资条约实践与判例法:投资者保护与国家一般利益之间的平衡?

F. Ortino, Domenico Di Pietro
{"title":"意大利投资条约实践与判例法:投资者保护与国家一般利益之间的平衡?","authors":"F. Ortino, Domenico Di Pietro","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2366345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the mid 1960s Italy has concluded bilateral investment treaties (BITs) with almost 100 countries. In the last fifteen years, there have been in excess of twenty (known) international arbitrations brought under Italian BITs. The underlying aim of the chapter is to assess the balance between investment protection and the sovereign right to regulate in the public interest that Italian BITs have struck. Such assessment will be carried out on the basis of an analysis of the content and evolution of Italy’s investment treaty making over the last forty years as well as an examination of the way Italian treaties have been interpreted and applied by investment tribunals over the last two decades. The main findings of this chapter are as follows: while Italian BITs show some form of evolution in terms of scope of protection, the balance between investment protection and the sovereign right to regulate remains an open question as the interpretation of Italian BITs by arbitral tribunals settling disputes between Italian investors and a variety of host States has been influenced by the diverse and evolving arbitral case law relating to the broader world of investment treaties.","PeriodicalId":319905,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Treaties & Other Sources of International Law (Topic)","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Italy's Investment Treaty Practice and Case-Law: What Balance between Investors’ Protection and General Interests of States?\",\"authors\":\"F. Ortino, Domenico Di Pietro\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2366345\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since the mid 1960s Italy has concluded bilateral investment treaties (BITs) with almost 100 countries. In the last fifteen years, there have been in excess of twenty (known) international arbitrations brought under Italian BITs. The underlying aim of the chapter is to assess the balance between investment protection and the sovereign right to regulate in the public interest that Italian BITs have struck. Such assessment will be carried out on the basis of an analysis of the content and evolution of Italy’s investment treaty making over the last forty years as well as an examination of the way Italian treaties have been interpreted and applied by investment tribunals over the last two decades. The main findings of this chapter are as follows: while Italian BITs show some form of evolution in terms of scope of protection, the balance between investment protection and the sovereign right to regulate remains an open question as the interpretation of Italian BITs by arbitral tribunals settling disputes between Italian investors and a variety of host States has been influenced by the diverse and evolving arbitral case law relating to the broader world of investment treaties.\",\"PeriodicalId\":319905,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LSN: Treaties & Other Sources of International Law (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LSN: Treaties & Other Sources of International Law (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2366345\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Treaties & Other Sources of International Law (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2366345","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自20世纪60年代中期以来,意大利已经与近100个国家签订了双边投资协定(BITs)。在过去的15年里,有超过20个(已知的)国际仲裁在意大利双边投资协定下进行。本章的根本目的是评估投资保护与意大利双边投资协定所触及的公共利益监管主权之间的平衡。这种评估将在分析过去四十年来意大利投资条约制定的内容和演变以及审查过去二十年来投资法庭解释和适用意大利条约的方式的基础上进行。本章的主要结论如下:虽然意大利的双边投资协定在保护范围方面显示出某种形式的演变,但投资保护与监管主权之间的平衡仍然是一个悬而未决的问题,因为解决意大利投资者与各种东道国之间争端的仲裁法庭对意大利双边投资协定的解释受到与更广泛的投资条约世界有关的各种不断发展的仲裁判例法的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Italy's Investment Treaty Practice and Case-Law: What Balance between Investors’ Protection and General Interests of States?
Since the mid 1960s Italy has concluded bilateral investment treaties (BITs) with almost 100 countries. In the last fifteen years, there have been in excess of twenty (known) international arbitrations brought under Italian BITs. The underlying aim of the chapter is to assess the balance between investment protection and the sovereign right to regulate in the public interest that Italian BITs have struck. Such assessment will be carried out on the basis of an analysis of the content and evolution of Italy’s investment treaty making over the last forty years as well as an examination of the way Italian treaties have been interpreted and applied by investment tribunals over the last two decades. The main findings of this chapter are as follows: while Italian BITs show some form of evolution in terms of scope of protection, the balance between investment protection and the sovereign right to regulate remains an open question as the interpretation of Italian BITs by arbitral tribunals settling disputes between Italian investors and a variety of host States has been influenced by the diverse and evolving arbitral case law relating to the broader world of investment treaties.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Network-Based Taxonomy of the World's Legal Systems Law and Governance as Checks and Balances in Transatlantic Security: Rights, Redress, and Remedies in EU-US Passenger Name Records and the Terrorist Finance Tracking Program The Validity of International Sales Contracts: Irrelevance of the 'Validity Exception' in Article 4 Vienna Sales Convention and a Novel Approach to Determining the Convention's Scope Italy's Investment Treaty Practice and Case-Law: What Balance between Investors’ Protection and General Interests of States? US Public Education as a Form of Thick Injustice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1