咨询犬儒主义:电子咨询何去何从?

P. McCusker, D. O'Donnell, S. Stephens, A. Logue
{"title":"咨询犬儒主义:电子咨询何去何从?","authors":"P. McCusker, D. O'Donnell, S. Stephens, A. Logue","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.818064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This working paper draws on the preliminary findings of eight focus group discussions on 'real world' consultation processes in both Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. We find that there exists a massive culture of cynicism amongst 'activist' citizens with respect to state/administration initiated consultation processes. This begs the key question: if such levels of cynicism exist - regardless of the sophistication of the ICT technology employed - whither the effectiveness of future e-consultation processes? We present no simplistic, naive or premature conclusions here but tease out some preliminary implications of these findings where we grant precedence to deliberative democracy over technology.","PeriodicalId":221779,"journal":{"name":"European Conference On e-Government","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consultation Cynicism: Whither e-Consultation?\",\"authors\":\"P. McCusker, D. O'Donnell, S. Stephens, A. Logue\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.818064\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This working paper draws on the preliminary findings of eight focus group discussions on 'real world' consultation processes in both Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. We find that there exists a massive culture of cynicism amongst 'activist' citizens with respect to state/administration initiated consultation processes. This begs the key question: if such levels of cynicism exist - regardless of the sophistication of the ICT technology employed - whither the effectiveness of future e-consultation processes? We present no simplistic, naive or premature conclusions here but tease out some preliminary implications of these findings where we grant precedence to deliberative democracy over technology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":221779,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Conference On e-Government\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Conference On e-Government\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.818064\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Conference On e-Government","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.818064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本工作文件借鉴了北爱尔兰和爱尔兰共和国关于“现实世界”协商进程的八次焦点小组讨论的初步结果。我们发现,在“积极分子”公民中,对于国家/行政部门发起的咨询过程,存在着一种大规模的犬儒主义文化。这就引出了一个关键问题:如果存在这种程度的玩世不恭——不管所采用的信息通信技术有多先进——未来电子咨询过程的有效性在哪里?我们在这里没有提出简单、天真或过早的结论,而是梳理出这些发现的一些初步含义,我们认为协商民主优先于技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Consultation Cynicism: Whither e-Consultation?
This working paper draws on the preliminary findings of eight focus group discussions on 'real world' consultation processes in both Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. We find that there exists a massive culture of cynicism amongst 'activist' citizens with respect to state/administration initiated consultation processes. This begs the key question: if such levels of cynicism exist - regardless of the sophistication of the ICT technology employed - whither the effectiveness of future e-consultation processes? We present no simplistic, naive or premature conclusions here but tease out some preliminary implications of these findings where we grant precedence to deliberative democracy over technology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Risk Assessment Framework for Electronic Voting Consultation Cynicism: Whither e-Consultation?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1