衡量税收立法的政治经济学:一种方法论和来自阿根廷的证据

Javier Alvaredo, A. Bonvecchi, Ernesto Calvo, Maximiliano Castillo, Juan Carlos Gómez Sabaini
{"title":"衡量税收立法的政治经济学:一种方法论和来自阿根廷的证据","authors":"Javier Alvaredo, A. Bonvecchi, Ernesto Calvo, Maximiliano Castillo, Juan Carlos Gómez Sabaini","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2367697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although recent research has shed new light on the political determinants and economic consequences of tax lawmaking, existing analyses rely on coarse data measuring political aggregates. Consequently, little is known about the political processes determining how tax legislation is written or their effect on the nature of tax reforms. This paper therefore develops a methodology to examine how Congress edits the content of tax legislation by measuring the ways Deputies, Senators, Presidents, and Ministers propose and amend such legislation. The Legislative Substance Scale proposed here measures the distance between a bill’s original position and the actual outcome of the legislative process by comparing the differences in content according to coding of the main tax policy dimensions. The scale is used to build the first systematic database of tax lawmaking in Argentina, and to describe its general patterns of authorship, approval and substantive content across presidencies in the current democratic period.","PeriodicalId":424829,"journal":{"name":"Inter-American Development Bank Research Paper Series","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring the Political Economy of Tax Lawmaking: A Methodology and Evidence from Argentina\",\"authors\":\"Javier Alvaredo, A. Bonvecchi, Ernesto Calvo, Maximiliano Castillo, Juan Carlos Gómez Sabaini\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2367697\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although recent research has shed new light on the political determinants and economic consequences of tax lawmaking, existing analyses rely on coarse data measuring political aggregates. Consequently, little is known about the political processes determining how tax legislation is written or their effect on the nature of tax reforms. This paper therefore develops a methodology to examine how Congress edits the content of tax legislation by measuring the ways Deputies, Senators, Presidents, and Ministers propose and amend such legislation. The Legislative Substance Scale proposed here measures the distance between a bill’s original position and the actual outcome of the legislative process by comparing the differences in content according to coding of the main tax policy dimensions. The scale is used to build the first systematic database of tax lawmaking in Argentina, and to describe its general patterns of authorship, approval and substantive content across presidencies in the current democratic period.\",\"PeriodicalId\":424829,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Inter-American Development Bank Research Paper Series\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Inter-American Development Bank Research Paper Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2367697\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inter-American Development Bank Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2367697","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

尽管最近的研究对税收立法的政治决定因素和经济后果有了新的认识,但现有的分析依赖于衡量政治总量的粗略数据。因此,人们对决定如何制定税收立法的政治过程或它们对税收改革性质的影响知之甚少。因此,本文开发了一种方法,通过衡量众议员、参议员、总统和部长提出和修改税收立法的方式,来研究国会如何编辑税收立法的内容。本文提出的立法实质量表(Legislative Substance Scale)是根据主要税收政策维度的编码,通过比较内容差异来衡量法案的原始位置与立法过程的实际结果之间的距离。该量表用于建立阿根廷第一个税收立法的系统数据库,并描述了当前民主时期各总统税收立法的作者、批准和实质性内容的一般模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Measuring the Political Economy of Tax Lawmaking: A Methodology and Evidence from Argentina
Although recent research has shed new light on the political determinants and economic consequences of tax lawmaking, existing analyses rely on coarse data measuring political aggregates. Consequently, little is known about the political processes determining how tax legislation is written or their effect on the nature of tax reforms. This paper therefore develops a methodology to examine how Congress edits the content of tax legislation by measuring the ways Deputies, Senators, Presidents, and Ministers propose and amend such legislation. The Legislative Substance Scale proposed here measures the distance between a bill’s original position and the actual outcome of the legislative process by comparing the differences in content according to coding of the main tax policy dimensions. The scale is used to build the first systematic database of tax lawmaking in Argentina, and to describe its general patterns of authorship, approval and substantive content across presidencies in the current democratic period.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Does Rewarding Pedagogical Excellence Keep Teachers in the Classroom? Domestic Antidotes to Sudden Stops Current Expenditure Upswings in Good Times and Capital Expenditure Downswings in Bad Times?: New Evidence from Developing Countries When the Victor Cannot Claim the Spoils: Institutional Incentives for Professionalizing Patronage States Sharing a Ride on the Commodities Roller Coaster: Common Factors in Business Cycles of Emerging
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1