马克斯·韦伯与人类学

Michael Löwy, Eleni Varikas
{"title":"马克斯·韦伯与人类学","authors":"Michael Löwy, Eleni Varikas","doi":"10.1353/max.2021.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:In spite of the obvious presence of anthropological analysis in his writings, Weber is seldom considered as an anthropologist. We think however that an ‘anthropological moment’ is indeed one of the components of his work: a significant part of his writings deals with so-called ‘archaic’ societies. In the last analysis, his scientific project—the formation of the Western modern rationality—only becomes meaningful through the gap with ‘primitive’ societies. Weber is therefore an anthropologist, in so far as he wants to explain pre-modern societies, and from this analysis he wants to follow concepts that are useful to understand modernity. Anthropology and sociology are inseparable from a historical approach. What distinguishes them is less the method or the objects—religion, social norms, family—than the kind of society/community studied.","PeriodicalId":103306,"journal":{"name":"Max Weber Studies","volume":"82 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Max Weber and Anthropology\",\"authors\":\"Michael Löwy, Eleni Varikas\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/max.2021.0004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:In spite of the obvious presence of anthropological analysis in his writings, Weber is seldom considered as an anthropologist. We think however that an ‘anthropological moment’ is indeed one of the components of his work: a significant part of his writings deals with so-called ‘archaic’ societies. In the last analysis, his scientific project—the formation of the Western modern rationality—only becomes meaningful through the gap with ‘primitive’ societies. Weber is therefore an anthropologist, in so far as he wants to explain pre-modern societies, and from this analysis he wants to follow concepts that are useful to understand modernity. Anthropology and sociology are inseparable from a historical approach. What distinguishes them is less the method or the objects—religion, social norms, family—than the kind of society/community studied.\",\"PeriodicalId\":103306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Max Weber Studies\",\"volume\":\"82 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Max Weber Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/max.2021.0004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Max Weber Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/max.2021.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:尽管在韦伯的著作中出现了明显的人类学分析,但人们很少把他看作一个人类学家。然而,我们认为“人类学时刻”确实是他作品的组成部分之一:他的作品中有很大一部分是关于所谓的“古代”社会的。归根到底,他的科学计划——西方现代理性的形成——只有通过与“原始”社会的鸿沟才有意义。因此,韦伯是一名人类学家,因为他想要解释前现代社会,从这种分析中,他想要遵循对理解现代性有用的概念。人类学和社会学都离不开历史的研究方法。区别它们的不是方法或对象——宗教、社会规范、家庭——而是研究的社会/社区类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Max Weber and Anthropology
Abstract:In spite of the obvious presence of anthropological analysis in his writings, Weber is seldom considered as an anthropologist. We think however that an ‘anthropological moment’ is indeed one of the components of his work: a significant part of his writings deals with so-called ‘archaic’ societies. In the last analysis, his scientific project—the formation of the Western modern rationality—only becomes meaningful through the gap with ‘primitive’ societies. Weber is therefore an anthropologist, in so far as he wants to explain pre-modern societies, and from this analysis he wants to follow concepts that are useful to understand modernity. Anthropology and sociology are inseparable from a historical approach. What distinguishes them is less the method or the objects—religion, social norms, family—than the kind of society/community studied.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Narratives of Disenchantment and Secularization: Critiquing Max Weber's Idea of Modernity ed. by Robert A Yelle and Lorenz Trein (review) List of Contributors Otto Neurath's Distorted Reception of Weber's Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism Methodology from the Standpoint of Experience: A Comparison of Max Weber, Heinrich Rickert and John Stuart Mill Planned Introduction to the Abriß der universalen Sozial- und Wirtschaftsgeschichte Mit- und Nachschriften 1919–1920 in the Max Weber Gesamtausgabe (Sections 1-6)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1