信息系统安全研究议程:探索研究与实践之间的差距

IF 8.7 2区 管理学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Journal of Strategic Information Systems Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jsis.2021.101693
Gurpreet Dhillon , Kane Smith , Indika Dissanayaka
{"title":"信息系统安全研究议程:探索研究与实践之间的差距","authors":"Gurpreet Dhillon ,&nbsp;Kane Smith ,&nbsp;Indika Dissanayaka","doi":"10.1016/j.jsis.2021.101693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper undertakes a systematic review of the Information Systems Security literature. The literature review consists of three parts: First, we perform topic modeling of major Information Systems journals to understand the field's debates. Second, we conduct a Delphi Study composed of the Chief Information Security Officers of major corporations in the US to identify security issues that they view as important. Third, we compare Topic Modeling and the Delphi Study results and discuss key debates, gaps, and contradictions within the academic literature. Further, extant Information Systems Security literature is reviewed to discuss where the academic community has placed the research emphasis and what is now required in the discipline. Based on our analysis, we propose a future agenda for Information Systems security research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50037,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strategic Information Systems","volume":"30 4","pages":"Article 101693"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Information systems security research agenda: Exploring the gap between research and practice\",\"authors\":\"Gurpreet Dhillon ,&nbsp;Kane Smith ,&nbsp;Indika Dissanayaka\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jsis.2021.101693\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper undertakes a systematic review of the Information Systems Security literature. The literature review consists of three parts: First, we perform topic modeling of major Information Systems journals to understand the field's debates. Second, we conduct a Delphi Study composed of the Chief Information Security Officers of major corporations in the US to identify security issues that they view as important. Third, we compare Topic Modeling and the Delphi Study results and discuss key debates, gaps, and contradictions within the academic literature. Further, extant Information Systems Security literature is reviewed to discuss where the academic community has placed the research emphasis and what is now required in the discipline. Based on our analysis, we propose a future agenda for Information Systems security research.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50037,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Strategic Information Systems\",\"volume\":\"30 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 101693\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Strategic Information Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0963868721000408\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Strategic Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0963868721000408","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

本文对信息系统安全文献进行了系统的回顾。文献综述包括三个部分:首先,我们对主要信息系统期刊进行主题建模,以了解该领域的争论。其次,我们对美国主要公司的首席信息安全官进行了德尔福研究,以确定他们认为重要的安全问题。第三,我们比较了主题模型和德尔菲研究的结果,并讨论了学术文献中的关键争论、差距和矛盾。此外,对现有的信息系统安全文献进行了回顾,以讨论学术界将研究重点放在何处以及该学科现在需要什么。在此基础上,提出了信息系统安全研究的未来发展方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Information systems security research agenda: Exploring the gap between research and practice

This paper undertakes a systematic review of the Information Systems Security literature. The literature review consists of three parts: First, we perform topic modeling of major Information Systems journals to understand the field's debates. Second, we conduct a Delphi Study composed of the Chief Information Security Officers of major corporations in the US to identify security issues that they view as important. Third, we compare Topic Modeling and the Delphi Study results and discuss key debates, gaps, and contradictions within the academic literature. Further, extant Information Systems Security literature is reviewed to discuss where the academic community has placed the research emphasis and what is now required in the discipline. Based on our analysis, we propose a future agenda for Information Systems security research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Strategic Information Systems
Journal of Strategic Information Systems 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
17.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Strategic Information Systems focuses on the strategic management, business and organizational issues associated with the introduction and utilization of information systems, and considers these issues in a global context. The emphasis is on the incorporation of IT into organizations'' strategic thinking, strategy alignment, organizational arrangements and management of change issues.
期刊最新文献
Sustaining IT outsourcing performance during a systemic crisis: A configurational approach Editorial Board Do CEOs matter? Divergent impact of CEO power on digital and non-digital innovation A knowledge-centric model for government-orchestrated digital transformation among the microbusiness sector A process model for design-oriented machine learning research in information systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1