{"title":"腐败辩护的心理策略","authors":"O. A. Zarichanskyi","doi":"10.32755/sjeducation.2022.02.114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the article was to highlight and thoroughly analyze the psychological methods by which corrupt people deny, justify or reduce their own guilt and try to interpret their actions as normal and correct ones. Research results. The article examines psychological techniques of justification (explanation) of corrupt behaviour. It is emphasized that unlike other types of crimes, corruption acts are usually committed by quite respectable and good people, who can be good parents, active members of the community, high officials, and who do not consider themselves as corrupted. One of the most important aspects of corruption is how the offenders defend or justify their actions using various concepts or mental techniques. These methods of justifying corrupt behaviour, which in various studies are called techniques of neutralization, rationalization, socialization, moral disengagement etc., became the subject of this scientific review. The neutralization of deviant behaviour is considered in the article as psychological techniques that help to completely or partially deny someone’s responsibility for deviant behaviour. It is noted that in order for there to be no or less guilt, neutralization can be carried out in two ways: on the one hand, by denying the deviant behaviour itself, and on the other hand, by denying responsibility for it. Conclusions. The leading techniques of neutralization are singled out: disclaimer of responsibility; denial of harm; denial of the victim; condemnation of condemners; appeal to greater loyalty, etc. Key words: responsibility, justification, denial of damage; condemnation, corruption, social norms.","PeriodicalId":371803,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Herald of Sivershchyna. Series: Education. Social and Behavioural Sciences","volume":"90 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PSYCHOLOGICAL TACTICS OF JUSTIFICATION OF CORRUPTION\",\"authors\":\"O. A. Zarichanskyi\",\"doi\":\"10.32755/sjeducation.2022.02.114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of the article was to highlight and thoroughly analyze the psychological methods by which corrupt people deny, justify or reduce their own guilt and try to interpret their actions as normal and correct ones. Research results. The article examines psychological techniques of justification (explanation) of corrupt behaviour. It is emphasized that unlike other types of crimes, corruption acts are usually committed by quite respectable and good people, who can be good parents, active members of the community, high officials, and who do not consider themselves as corrupted. One of the most important aspects of corruption is how the offenders defend or justify their actions using various concepts or mental techniques. These methods of justifying corrupt behaviour, which in various studies are called techniques of neutralization, rationalization, socialization, moral disengagement etc., became the subject of this scientific review. The neutralization of deviant behaviour is considered in the article as psychological techniques that help to completely or partially deny someone’s responsibility for deviant behaviour. It is noted that in order for there to be no or less guilt, neutralization can be carried out in two ways: on the one hand, by denying the deviant behaviour itself, and on the other hand, by denying responsibility for it. Conclusions. The leading techniques of neutralization are singled out: disclaimer of responsibility; denial of harm; denial of the victim; condemnation of condemners; appeal to greater loyalty, etc. Key words: responsibility, justification, denial of damage; condemnation, corruption, social norms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":371803,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Herald of Sivershchyna. Series: Education. Social and Behavioural Sciences\",\"volume\":\"90 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Herald of Sivershchyna. Series: Education. Social and Behavioural Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32755/sjeducation.2022.02.114\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Herald of Sivershchyna. Series: Education. Social and Behavioural Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32755/sjeducation.2022.02.114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章的目的是突出并深入分析腐败分子否认、辩护或减轻自己罪恶感的心理方法,并试图将他们的行为解释为正常和正确的行为。研究的结果。本文探讨了为腐败行为辩护(解释)的心理学技巧。需要强调的是,与其他类型的犯罪不同,腐败行为通常是由相当受人尊敬的好人实施的,他们可能是好父母、社区积极分子、高级官员,而且他们不认为自己腐败。腐败最重要的一个方面是罪犯如何利用各种概念或心理技巧为自己的行为辩护或辩护。这些为腐败行为辩护的方法,在各种研究中被称为中性化、合理化、社会化、道德脱离等技术,成为本科学综述的主题。在文章中,越轨行为的中和被认为是一种心理技巧,有助于完全或部分否认某人对越轨行为的责任。值得注意的是,为了没有或减少内疚,可以通过两种方式进行中和:一方面,通过否认异常行为本身,另一方面,通过否认对其负责。结论。列举了主要的中和方法:免责;否认伤害;否认受害者;谴责者的谴责;吸引更大的忠诚度等。关键词:责任、正当性、否认损害;谴责,腐败,社会规范。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PSYCHOLOGICAL TACTICS OF JUSTIFICATION OF CORRUPTION
The purpose of the article was to highlight and thoroughly analyze the psychological methods by which corrupt people deny, justify or reduce their own guilt and try to interpret their actions as normal and correct ones. Research results. The article examines psychological techniques of justification (explanation) of corrupt behaviour. It is emphasized that unlike other types of crimes, corruption acts are usually committed by quite respectable and good people, who can be good parents, active members of the community, high officials, and who do not consider themselves as corrupted. One of the most important aspects of corruption is how the offenders defend or justify their actions using various concepts or mental techniques. These methods of justifying corrupt behaviour, which in various studies are called techniques of neutralization, rationalization, socialization, moral disengagement etc., became the subject of this scientific review. The neutralization of deviant behaviour is considered in the article as psychological techniques that help to completely or partially deny someone’s responsibility for deviant behaviour. It is noted that in order for there to be no or less guilt, neutralization can be carried out in two ways: on the one hand, by denying the deviant behaviour itself, and on the other hand, by denying responsibility for it. Conclusions. The leading techniques of neutralization are singled out: disclaimer of responsibility; denial of harm; denial of the victim; condemnation of condemners; appeal to greater loyalty, etc. Key words: responsibility, justification, denial of damage; condemnation, corruption, social norms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC TRENDS OF THE LABOR MARKET IN THE CONDITIONS OF WAR ON THE ISSUE OF TAKING INTO ACCOUNT THE SOCIO-PSYCHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF PERSONS ACCUSED OF COLLABORATION OR CONVICTED OF SUCH CRIMES DIFFERENTIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL FEATURES OF ATTITUDES TOWARD WORK IN A STATE OF WAR TEST CONTROL OF THE LEVEL OF FORMATION OF ENGLISH LEXICAL COMPETENCE IN STUDENTS OF EDUCATION USING THE MEANS OF MOBILE TECHNOLOGIES SATISFACTION OF BACHELOR’S DEGREE STUDENTS OF SPECIALTY 012 «PRESCHOOL EDUCATION» WITH THE QUALITY OF THE EDUCATIONAL COMPONENT OF PROFESSIONAL TRAINING
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1