吸血鬼最残忍:吸血鬼与蝙蝠在德古拉时代之前

Kevin V. Dodd
{"title":"吸血鬼最残忍:吸血鬼与蝙蝠在德古拉时代之前","authors":"Kevin V. Dodd","doi":"10.30958/AJHA.6-2-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relationship between the nineteenth century vampire monster and the vampire bat has not yet been seriously investigated in English. Three common assumptions made by experts are examined in this paper. Current vampire historiography has held that Stokerʼs use of a huge bat as the vampire was either mistaken or a creative innovation and therefore requires explanation in those terms. It supposes that people in the nineteenth century understood the word \"vampire\" the way we do today. It presumes Dracula to be the first story to have a vampire monster transform into a bat. To consider these positions, we must first analyze the use of the bat in Dracula and then set it in the context of 19th-century conceptions of the vampire bat to see how mistaken or creative Stoker actually was. Thereafter a survey of 19th-century works that are said to be leading the way to Dracula is initiated to see if \"vampire\" had the same meaning then as it does today. Finally we will examine if Draculaʼs metamorphosis from a monster into a vampire bat had any precursors and, if so, how distinctive Stoker was in developing it.","PeriodicalId":325459,"journal":{"name":"ATHENS JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES & ARTS","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Blood Suckers Most Cruel:\\\" The Vampire and the Bat In and Before Dracula\",\"authors\":\"Kevin V. Dodd\",\"doi\":\"10.30958/AJHA.6-2-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The relationship between the nineteenth century vampire monster and the vampire bat has not yet been seriously investigated in English. Three common assumptions made by experts are examined in this paper. Current vampire historiography has held that Stokerʼs use of a huge bat as the vampire was either mistaken or a creative innovation and therefore requires explanation in those terms. It supposes that people in the nineteenth century understood the word \\\"vampire\\\" the way we do today. It presumes Dracula to be the first story to have a vampire monster transform into a bat. To consider these positions, we must first analyze the use of the bat in Dracula and then set it in the context of 19th-century conceptions of the vampire bat to see how mistaken or creative Stoker actually was. Thereafter a survey of 19th-century works that are said to be leading the way to Dracula is initiated to see if \\\"vampire\\\" had the same meaning then as it does today. Finally we will examine if Draculaʼs metamorphosis from a monster into a vampire bat had any precursors and, if so, how distinctive Stoker was in developing it.\",\"PeriodicalId\":325459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ATHENS JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES & ARTS\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ATHENS JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES & ARTS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30958/AJHA.6-2-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ATHENS JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES & ARTS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30958/AJHA.6-2-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

19世纪的吸血怪物和吸血蝙蝠之间的关系在英语中还没有被认真研究过。本文检验了专家们提出的三个常见假设。当前的吸血鬼史学认为,斯托克使用一只巨大的蝙蝠作为吸血鬼要么是错误的,要么是一种创造性的创新,因此需要用这些术语来解释。它假设19世纪的人们和我们今天一样理解“吸血鬼”这个词。它假定德古拉是第一个吸血鬼怪物变成蝙蝠的故事。要考虑这些立场,我们必须首先分析《德古拉》中蝙蝠的使用,然后把它放在19世纪吸血蝙蝠概念的背景下,看看斯托克到底是错了还是有创意。此后,一项对19世纪作品的调查开始了,据说这些作品引领了德古拉的发展,以确定“吸血鬼”在当时是否与今天的含义相同。最后,我们将研究德古拉从怪物变成吸血蝙蝠是否有任何先驱者,如果有的话,斯托克在发展这一过程中有多独特。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"Blood Suckers Most Cruel:" The Vampire and the Bat In and Before Dracula
The relationship between the nineteenth century vampire monster and the vampire bat has not yet been seriously investigated in English. Three common assumptions made by experts are examined in this paper. Current vampire historiography has held that Stokerʼs use of a huge bat as the vampire was either mistaken or a creative innovation and therefore requires explanation in those terms. It supposes that people in the nineteenth century understood the word "vampire" the way we do today. It presumes Dracula to be the first story to have a vampire monster transform into a bat. To consider these positions, we must first analyze the use of the bat in Dracula and then set it in the context of 19th-century conceptions of the vampire bat to see how mistaken or creative Stoker actually was. Thereafter a survey of 19th-century works that are said to be leading the way to Dracula is initiated to see if "vampire" had the same meaning then as it does today. Finally we will examine if Draculaʼs metamorphosis from a monster into a vampire bat had any precursors and, if so, how distinctive Stoker was in developing it.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the Emotional Impact of Environmental Artworks Using Q Methodology Research on Arts and Humanities: A Selected Survey and Works Presented at ATINER’s Annual Humanities and Arts Conferences Current Insights into the Evolution of Cameroon English: The Contribution of the ‘Anglophone Problem’ Some Remarks on the Five Criteria of Democracy Gorgo: Sparta’s Woman of Autonomy, Authority, and Agency
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1