乌克兰司法实践中论证的特点

Volodymyr Kistianyk
{"title":"乌克兰司法实践中论证的特点","authors":"Volodymyr Kistianyk","doi":"10.15804/ksm20200303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is devoted to some features of the argumentation contained in decisions of Ukrainian courts. The article describes typical problems that oc-cur during judicial argumentation, which hinder quality of justice. The author analyzes the logical approach to judicial argumentation, argumentation based on principles, the rhetorical approach and inductive as well as deductive argumentation during proceedings in Ukrainian courts. These are some of the most widely used approaches in judicial argumentation. The article provides some recommendations that can improve argumentation in Ukrainian judicial practice. These problems can be solved by improving the level of legal culture, increasing the education of litigants and by using other methods.","PeriodicalId":431204,"journal":{"name":"Krakowskie Studia Małopolskie","volume":"94 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Specifics of Argumentation in Judicial Practice in Ukraine\",\"authors\":\"Volodymyr Kistianyk\",\"doi\":\"10.15804/ksm20200303\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article is devoted to some features of the argumentation contained in decisions of Ukrainian courts. The article describes typical problems that oc-cur during judicial argumentation, which hinder quality of justice. The author analyzes the logical approach to judicial argumentation, argumentation based on principles, the rhetorical approach and inductive as well as deductive argumentation during proceedings in Ukrainian courts. These are some of the most widely used approaches in judicial argumentation. The article provides some recommendations that can improve argumentation in Ukrainian judicial practice. These problems can be solved by improving the level of legal culture, increasing the education of litigants and by using other methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":431204,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Krakowskie Studia Małopolskie\",\"volume\":\"94 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Krakowskie Studia Małopolskie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15804/ksm20200303\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Krakowskie Studia Małopolskie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15804/ksm20200303","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文主要介绍乌克兰法院判决中论证的一些特点。文章描述了司法论证过程中出现的典型问题,这些问题妨碍了司法质量。作者分析了司法论证的逻辑方法、基于原则的论证、修辞方法以及乌克兰法院诉讼过程中的归纳和演绎论证。这些都是司法论证中使用最广泛的方法。文章就如何改进乌克兰司法实践中的论证提出了一些建议。这些问题可以通过提高法律文化水平、加强对诉讼当事人的教育以及使用其他方法来解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Specifics of Argumentation in Judicial Practice in Ukraine
This article is devoted to some features of the argumentation contained in decisions of Ukrainian courts. The article describes typical problems that oc-cur during judicial argumentation, which hinder quality of justice. The author analyzes the logical approach to judicial argumentation, argumentation based on principles, the rhetorical approach and inductive as well as deductive argumentation during proceedings in Ukrainian courts. These are some of the most widely used approaches in judicial argumentation. The article provides some recommendations that can improve argumentation in Ukrainian judicial practice. These problems can be solved by improving the level of legal culture, increasing the education of litigants and by using other methods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How the natural resource curse contributed to the autocratic developments in Russian politics since the fall of the USSR Methodological importance of legal constructions and their influence on the legal norms interpretation Democratization and federalization. A comparative perspective between Russia’s and Spain’s early forays into a federal system Prospects for introducing the concept of “digital things” and “digital content”: expanding the scope of regulation of virtual assets Francuska polityka kolonialna w Afryce Zachodniej
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1