偏振目标检测算法的性能研究

R. D. Chaney, M. Burl, L. Novak
{"title":"偏振目标检测算法的性能研究","authors":"R. D. Chaney, M. Burl, L. Novak","doi":"10.1109/RADAR.1990.201114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The performance of six polarimetric target detection algorithms is analyzed. The detection performance of the optimal polarimetric detector (OPD), the identity-likelihood-ratio-test (ILRT), the polarimetric whitening filter (PWF), the single-polarimetric-channel detector, the span detector, and the power maximization synthesis (PMS) detector is compared. Results for both probabilistic and deterministic targets in the presence of complex-Gaussian clutter are presented. The results of these studies indicate that the PWF and the ILRT typically achieve near optimal performance. Each remaining detection algorithm typically yields performance that is degraded compared to the performance of the OPD, the PWF, and the ILRT.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":441674,"journal":{"name":"IEEE International Conference on Radar","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the performance of polarimetric target detection algorithms\",\"authors\":\"R. D. Chaney, M. Burl, L. Novak\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RADAR.1990.201114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The performance of six polarimetric target detection algorithms is analyzed. The detection performance of the optimal polarimetric detector (OPD), the identity-likelihood-ratio-test (ILRT), the polarimetric whitening filter (PWF), the single-polarimetric-channel detector, the span detector, and the power maximization synthesis (PMS) detector is compared. Results for both probabilistic and deterministic targets in the presence of complex-Gaussian clutter are presented. The results of these studies indicate that the PWF and the ILRT typically achieve near optimal performance. Each remaining detection algorithm typically yields performance that is degraded compared to the performance of the OPD, the PWF, and the ILRT.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":441674,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE International Conference on Radar\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE International Conference on Radar\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/RADAR.1990.201114\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE International Conference on Radar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RADAR.1990.201114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

分析了六种偏振目标检测算法的性能。比较了最优偏振检测器(OPD)、同似比检验(ILRT)、偏振白化滤波器(PWF)、单偏振通道检测器、跨度检测器和功率最大化合成(PMS)检测器的检测性能。给出了复高斯杂波存在下的概率目标和确定性目标的结果。这些研究的结果表明,PWF和ILRT通常达到接近最佳的性能。与OPD、PWF和ILRT相比,每种剩余的检测算法的性能通常都有所下降
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
On the performance of polarimetric target detection algorithms
The performance of six polarimetric target detection algorithms is analyzed. The detection performance of the optimal polarimetric detector (OPD), the identity-likelihood-ratio-test (ILRT), the polarimetric whitening filter (PWF), the single-polarimetric-channel detector, the span detector, and the power maximization synthesis (PMS) detector is compared. Results for both probabilistic and deterministic targets in the presence of complex-Gaussian clutter are presented. The results of these studies indicate that the PWF and the ILRT typically achieve near optimal performance. Each remaining detection algorithm typically yields performance that is degraded compared to the performance of the OPD, the PWF, and the ILRT.<>
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Coherent radar system performance estimation Simultaneous scattering matrix measurement through signal coding Review of the homodyne technique for coherent radar Detection performance and systolic architectures for OS-CFAR detectors Software development for airborne radar
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1