适合工作:实验室人体工程学的文献计量学综述

{"title":"适合工作:实验室人体工程学的文献计量学综述","authors":"","doi":"10.55057/ijares.2023.5.2.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The advent of new technologies in the modern era has significantly altered the essence of labour. The field of laboratory ergonomics is an indispensable area of research that endeavours to recognise and tackle ergonomic concerns within laboratory environments. The objective of this bibliometric analysis is to conduct a comprehensive examination of the current literature on laboratory ergonomics while also identifying potential research gaps that require further investigation. The bibliometric parameters of this study were analysed using the Scopus and Web of Science (WoS) databases. The bibliometric datasets, which included the number of publications and author keywords, were analysed using the ScientoPy software. The results suggest that there are varying trends in the research of laboratory ergonomics, as evidenced by fluctuations in the yearly publication figure. The United States is recognised as a leading contributor to laboratory ergonomics research, as evidenced by its significant number of publications. Engineering, Sport Sciences, and Psychology fields have garnered significant research interest, whereas other domains, such as Behavioural Sciences and Public, Environmental & Occupational Health, have received comparatively lesser attention. The investigation additionally recognised nascent patterns in laboratory ergonomics research, including the escalating curiosity in examining the impacts of movement and posture on the physical well-being of laboratory personnel. The discoveries mentioned offer significant perspectives on the present status of laboratory ergonomics research, underscore domains that necessitate additional exploration, and enlighten future research trajectories.","PeriodicalId":426882,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Advanced Research in Education and Society","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fit for Work: A Bibliometric Review of Laboratory Ergonomics\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.55057/ijares.2023.5.2.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The advent of new technologies in the modern era has significantly altered the essence of labour. The field of laboratory ergonomics is an indispensable area of research that endeavours to recognise and tackle ergonomic concerns within laboratory environments. The objective of this bibliometric analysis is to conduct a comprehensive examination of the current literature on laboratory ergonomics while also identifying potential research gaps that require further investigation. The bibliometric parameters of this study were analysed using the Scopus and Web of Science (WoS) databases. The bibliometric datasets, which included the number of publications and author keywords, were analysed using the ScientoPy software. The results suggest that there are varying trends in the research of laboratory ergonomics, as evidenced by fluctuations in the yearly publication figure. The United States is recognised as a leading contributor to laboratory ergonomics research, as evidenced by its significant number of publications. Engineering, Sport Sciences, and Psychology fields have garnered significant research interest, whereas other domains, such as Behavioural Sciences and Public, Environmental & Occupational Health, have received comparatively lesser attention. The investigation additionally recognised nascent patterns in laboratory ergonomics research, including the escalating curiosity in examining the impacts of movement and posture on the physical well-being of laboratory personnel. The discoveries mentioned offer significant perspectives on the present status of laboratory ergonomics research, underscore domains that necessitate additional exploration, and enlighten future research trajectories.\",\"PeriodicalId\":426882,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Advanced Research in Education and Society\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Advanced Research in Education and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55057/ijares.2023.5.2.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Advanced Research in Education and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55057/ijares.2023.5.2.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

现代新技术的出现极大地改变了劳动的本质。实验室人体工程学领域是一个不可或缺的研究领域,致力于识别和解决实验室环境中的人体工程学问题。这项文献计量学分析的目的是对实验室人体工程学的当前文献进行全面的检查,同时也确定需要进一步调查的潜在研究差距。采用Scopus和Web of Science (WoS)数据库对文献计量学参数进行分析。使用ScientoPy软件对包括出版物数量和作者关键词在内的文献计量数据集进行分析。结果表明,实验室人体工程学的研究有不同的趋势,正如每年发表的数字的波动所证明的那样。美国被认为是实验室人体工程学研究的主要贡献者,其大量出版物证明了这一点。工程、运动科学和心理学领域已经获得了显著的研究兴趣,而其他领域,如行为科学和公共、环境与职业健康,受到的关注相对较少。该调查还发现了实验室人体工程学研究的新模式,包括对研究运动和姿势对实验室人员身体健康的影响的日益增长的好奇心。这些发现为实验室人体工程学研究的现状提供了重要的视角,强调了需要进一步探索的领域,并启发了未来的研究轨迹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Fit for Work: A Bibliometric Review of Laboratory Ergonomics
The advent of new technologies in the modern era has significantly altered the essence of labour. The field of laboratory ergonomics is an indispensable area of research that endeavours to recognise and tackle ergonomic concerns within laboratory environments. The objective of this bibliometric analysis is to conduct a comprehensive examination of the current literature on laboratory ergonomics while also identifying potential research gaps that require further investigation. The bibliometric parameters of this study were analysed using the Scopus and Web of Science (WoS) databases. The bibliometric datasets, which included the number of publications and author keywords, were analysed using the ScientoPy software. The results suggest that there are varying trends in the research of laboratory ergonomics, as evidenced by fluctuations in the yearly publication figure. The United States is recognised as a leading contributor to laboratory ergonomics research, as evidenced by its significant number of publications. Engineering, Sport Sciences, and Psychology fields have garnered significant research interest, whereas other domains, such as Behavioural Sciences and Public, Environmental & Occupational Health, have received comparatively lesser attention. The investigation additionally recognised nascent patterns in laboratory ergonomics research, including the escalating curiosity in examining the impacts of movement and posture on the physical well-being of laboratory personnel. The discoveries mentioned offer significant perspectives on the present status of laboratory ergonomics research, underscore domains that necessitate additional exploration, and enlighten future research trajectories.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Underachiever Studies of Gifted and Talented Students: Types and Implications Study On Application of Open Online Psychological Courses to Mental Health Education of College Students Kajian Jati Diri Holistik Pelajar Pintar dan Berbakat di Malaysia Measuring Student Adoption of Digital Platforms for Distance Education among University Students in Malaysia Penerapan Konsep Malaysia MADANI dalam Dasar Awam: Membudayakan Harmoni dalam Kepelbagaian
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1