为什么工程师会思考?

P. Moschella
{"title":"为什么工程师会思考?","authors":"P. Moschella","doi":"10.1109/FIE.1989.69432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is noted that technology has received severe criticism for being myopic, insensitive, without vision, and unaware of its social impacts. The author emphasizes that technologists and managers provide services to society and can no longer view their role and the associated thinking as simply solving challenging physical problems. It is argued that technologists and their managers should not consciously or unconsciously restrict their thinking capabilities to the solution of technical and physical problems. Society expects from the technologist satisfaction of its needs, which is a much larger task than solutions for the related physical problems. The author focuses on the next stage of the thinking and achieving process-establishing the 'true' nature and content of the situation confronting the technologist. Methodology for executing this stage of the process is limited. An initial schema is presented for operationalizing this cognitive function. The computer engine for facilitating questioning appeared to perform adequately, although there is room for improvement and enhancement.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":319513,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings 1989 Frontiers in Education Conference","volume":"110 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why do engineers think?\",\"authors\":\"P. Moschella\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/FIE.1989.69432\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is noted that technology has received severe criticism for being myopic, insensitive, without vision, and unaware of its social impacts. The author emphasizes that technologists and managers provide services to society and can no longer view their role and the associated thinking as simply solving challenging physical problems. It is argued that technologists and their managers should not consciously or unconsciously restrict their thinking capabilities to the solution of technical and physical problems. Society expects from the technologist satisfaction of its needs, which is a much larger task than solutions for the related physical problems. The author focuses on the next stage of the thinking and achieving process-establishing the 'true' nature and content of the situation confronting the technologist. Methodology for executing this stage of the process is limited. An initial schema is presented for operationalizing this cognitive function. The computer engine for facilitating questioning appeared to perform adequately, although there is room for improvement and enhancement.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":319513,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings 1989 Frontiers in Education Conference\",\"volume\":\"110 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings 1989 Frontiers in Education Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.1989.69432\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings 1989 Frontiers in Education Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.1989.69432","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

值得注意的是,科技因目光短浅、不敏感、没有远见、不了解其社会影响而受到严厉批评。作者强调,技术人员和管理人员为社会提供服务,不能再把他们的角色和相关的思维看作是简单地解决具有挑战性的物理问题。本文认为,技术人员及其管理者不应自觉或不自觉地将自己的思维能力局限于解决技术和物理问题。社会期望技术人员能满足它的需求,这比解决相关的物理问题要大得多。作者着重于思考和实现过程的下一个阶段——确立技术专家所面临的情况的“真实”性质和内容。执行流程这一阶段的方法是有限的。提出了一种初始图式来实现这一认知功能。促进提问的计算机引擎似乎表现良好,但仍有改进和增强的余地。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Why do engineers think?
It is noted that technology has received severe criticism for being myopic, insensitive, without vision, and unaware of its social impacts. The author emphasizes that technologists and managers provide services to society and can no longer view their role and the associated thinking as simply solving challenging physical problems. It is argued that technologists and their managers should not consciously or unconsciously restrict their thinking capabilities to the solution of technical and physical problems. Society expects from the technologist satisfaction of its needs, which is a much larger task than solutions for the related physical problems. The author focuses on the next stage of the thinking and achieving process-establishing the 'true' nature and content of the situation confronting the technologist. Methodology for executing this stage of the process is limited. An initial schema is presented for operationalizing this cognitive function. The computer engine for facilitating questioning appeared to perform adequately, although there is room for improvement and enhancement.<>
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A graphical animation authoring system for in-class demonstration of circuit operation Experiences with the New Jersey Master Faculty Program Teaching circuit analysis with MICRO-CAP II On the implementation of a nationwide expertise educational network Cooperation not competition (engineering education)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1