C11内存模型下的篱笆合成

Sanjana Singh, Divyanjali Sharma, Ishita Jaju, Subodh Sharma
{"title":"C11内存模型下的篱笆合成","authors":"Sanjana Singh, Divyanjali Sharma, Ishita Jaju, Subodh Sharma","doi":"10.48550/arXiv.2208.00285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The C/C++11 (C11) standard offers a spectrum of ordering guarantees on memory access operations. The combinations of such orderings pose a challenge in developing correct and efficient weak memory programs. A common solution to preclude those program outcomes that violate the correctness specification is using C11 synchronization-fences, which establish ordering on program events. The challenge is in choosing a combination of fences that (i) restores the correctness of the input program, with (ii) as little impact on efficiency as possible (i.e., the smallest set of weakest fences). This problem is the optimal fence synthesis problem and is NP-hard for straight-line programs. In this work, we propose the first fence synthesis technique for C11 programs called FenSying and show its optimality. We additionally propose a near-optimal efficient alternative called fFenSying. We prove the optimality of FenSying and the soundness of fFenSying and present an implementation of both techniques. Finally, we contrast the performance of the two techniques and empirically demonstrate fFenSyings effectiveness.","PeriodicalId":335085,"journal":{"name":"Automated Technology for Verification and Analysis","volume":"398 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fence Synthesis under the C11 Memory Model\",\"authors\":\"Sanjana Singh, Divyanjali Sharma, Ishita Jaju, Subodh Sharma\",\"doi\":\"10.48550/arXiv.2208.00285\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The C/C++11 (C11) standard offers a spectrum of ordering guarantees on memory access operations. The combinations of such orderings pose a challenge in developing correct and efficient weak memory programs. A common solution to preclude those program outcomes that violate the correctness specification is using C11 synchronization-fences, which establish ordering on program events. The challenge is in choosing a combination of fences that (i) restores the correctness of the input program, with (ii) as little impact on efficiency as possible (i.e., the smallest set of weakest fences). This problem is the optimal fence synthesis problem and is NP-hard for straight-line programs. In this work, we propose the first fence synthesis technique for C11 programs called FenSying and show its optimality. We additionally propose a near-optimal efficient alternative called fFenSying. We prove the optimality of FenSying and the soundness of fFenSying and present an implementation of both techniques. Finally, we contrast the performance of the two techniques and empirically demonstrate fFenSyings effectiveness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":335085,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Automated Technology for Verification and Analysis\",\"volume\":\"398 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Automated Technology for Verification and Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2208.00285\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Automated Technology for Verification and Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2208.00285","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

C/ c++ 11 (C11)标准为内存访问操作提供了一系列排序保证。这些顺序的组合对开发正确有效的弱记忆程序提出了挑战。防止这些违反正确性规范的程序结果的常见解决方案是使用C11同步栅栏,它在程序事件上建立顺序。挑战在于选择一个栅栏的组合(i)恢复输入程序的正确性,(ii)对效率的影响尽可能小(即,最小的最弱栅栏集合)。该问题是最优围栏综合问题,是线性规划的np困难问题。本文提出了第一种用于C11程序的围栏合成技术——围栏合成,并证明了其最优性。我们还提出了一种近乎最优的高效替代方案,称为fFenSying。我们证明了分联的最优性和分联的合理性,并给出了两种技术的实现。最后,我们对比了两种技术的性能,并实证证明了fFenSyings的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Fence Synthesis under the C11 Memory Model
The C/C++11 (C11) standard offers a spectrum of ordering guarantees on memory access operations. The combinations of such orderings pose a challenge in developing correct and efficient weak memory programs. A common solution to preclude those program outcomes that violate the correctness specification is using C11 synchronization-fences, which establish ordering on program events. The challenge is in choosing a combination of fences that (i) restores the correctness of the input program, with (ii) as little impact on efficiency as possible (i.e., the smallest set of weakest fences). This problem is the optimal fence synthesis problem and is NP-hard for straight-line programs. In this work, we propose the first fence synthesis technique for C11 programs called FenSying and show its optimality. We additionally propose a near-optimal efficient alternative called fFenSying. We prove the optimality of FenSying and the soundness of fFenSying and present an implementation of both techniques. Finally, we contrast the performance of the two techniques and empirically demonstrate fFenSyings effectiveness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fast Equivalence Checking of Quantum Circuits of Clifford Gates An Automata-Theoretic Approach to Synthesizing Binarized Neural Networks Syntactic vs Semantic Linear Abstraction and Refinement of Neural Networks Synthesis of Distributed Protocols by Enumeration Modulo Isomorphisms Minimally Comparing Relational Abstract Domains
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1