米尔顿·弗里德曼:构建一个反凯恩斯主义

C. Freedman, G. Harcourt, Peter Kriesler, J. Nevile
{"title":"米尔顿·弗里德曼:构建一个反凯恩斯主义","authors":"C. Freedman, G. Harcourt, Peter Kriesler, J. Nevile","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2374956","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper considers Keynes’s major contributions before \"The General Theory\", namely \"A Tract on Monetary Reform\" and \"A Treatise on Money\", and shows that they were close to the views which Friedman would later develop. However, \"The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money\" represented a major challenge to the orthodoxy of the time, and it was to this that Friedman radically objected. We identify the main areas in which Keynes departed from the mainstream theory of the time, and show how Friedman attempted to undermine each of Keynes’s major contributions and the extent to which he was successful. Friedman regarded Keynes’s contributions as detrimental to, and a definitive step backward for, the economics profession.","PeriodicalId":180753,"journal":{"name":"UNSW: Economics (Topic)","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Milton Friedman: Constructing an Anti-Keynes\",\"authors\":\"C. Freedman, G. Harcourt, Peter Kriesler, J. Nevile\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2374956\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper considers Keynes’s major contributions before \\\"The General Theory\\\", namely \\\"A Tract on Monetary Reform\\\" and \\\"A Treatise on Money\\\", and shows that they were close to the views which Friedman would later develop. However, \\\"The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money\\\" represented a major challenge to the orthodoxy of the time, and it was to this that Friedman radically objected. We identify the main areas in which Keynes departed from the mainstream theory of the time, and show how Friedman attempted to undermine each of Keynes’s major contributions and the extent to which he was successful. Friedman regarded Keynes’s contributions as detrimental to, and a definitive step backward for, the economics profession.\",\"PeriodicalId\":180753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"UNSW: Economics (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"UNSW: Economics (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2374956\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UNSW: Economics (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2374956","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文考察了凯恩斯在《通论》之前的主要贡献,即《货币改革论》和《货币论》,并表明它们与弗里德曼后来发展的观点接近。然而,《就业、利息和货币通论》对当时的正统理论提出了重大挑战,而弗里德曼也对此表示了强烈的反对。我们确定了凯恩斯偏离当时主流理论的主要领域,并展示了弗里德曼如何试图破坏凯恩斯的每一个主要贡献,以及他在多大程度上取得了成功。弗里德曼认为凯恩斯的贡献对经济学专业是有害的,而且是决定性的倒退。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Milton Friedman: Constructing an Anti-Keynes
The paper considers Keynes’s major contributions before "The General Theory", namely "A Tract on Monetary Reform" and "A Treatise on Money", and shows that they were close to the views which Friedman would later develop. However, "The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money" represented a major challenge to the orthodoxy of the time, and it was to this that Friedman radically objected. We identify the main areas in which Keynes departed from the mainstream theory of the time, and show how Friedman attempted to undermine each of Keynes’s major contributions and the extent to which he was successful. Friedman regarded Keynes’s contributions as detrimental to, and a definitive step backward for, the economics profession.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Schumpeter's Assessment of Adam Smith and 'The Wealth of Nations': Why He Got It Wrong Multinational Suppliers: Are They Different from Exporters? Health Care Spending and Hidden Poverty in India Alternative User Costs, Productivity and Inequality in US Business Sectors Do Significant Labour Market Events Change Who Does the Laundry? Work, Chore Allocation, and Power in Australian Households
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1