关贸总协定担保条款的裁决:存在还是不存在,这是一个问题

I. Bogdanova
{"title":"关贸总协定担保条款的裁决:存在还是不存在,这是一个问题","authors":"I. Bogdanova","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3359187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Amidst the severe crisis the WTO’s crown jewel is facing these days, the WTO tribunals are confronted with another perplexed matter – adjudication of the security exception. In a number of the ongoing disputes the parties invoked national security to justify their trade-restrictive measures. The interpretation of the security exception raises a number of vexed questions. Before delving into the discussion of the interpretative intricacies, it is prudent to inquire whether the WTO tribunals have jurisdiction over the security clause and if it is justiciable.","PeriodicalId":390004,"journal":{"name":"University of Southern California Center for Law & Social Science (CLASS) Law & Economics Research Paper Series","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adjudication of the GATT Security Clause: To Be or Not to Be, This is the Question\",\"authors\":\"I. Bogdanova\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3359187\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Amidst the severe crisis the WTO’s crown jewel is facing these days, the WTO tribunals are confronted with another perplexed matter – adjudication of the security exception. In a number of the ongoing disputes the parties invoked national security to justify their trade-restrictive measures. The interpretation of the security exception raises a number of vexed questions. Before delving into the discussion of the interpretative intricacies, it is prudent to inquire whether the WTO tribunals have jurisdiction over the security clause and if it is justiciable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":390004,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"University of Southern California Center for Law & Social Science (CLASS) Law & Economics Research Paper Series\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"University of Southern California Center for Law & Social Science (CLASS) Law & Economics Research Paper Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3359187\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Southern California Center for Law & Social Science (CLASS) Law & Economics Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3359187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在WTO这颗“皇冠上的明珠”面临严重危机的今天,WTO法庭又面临着另一个难题——安全例外的裁决。在一些正在进行的争端中,各方以国家安全为由为其贸易限制措施辩护。对安全例外的解释引发了许多令人烦恼的问题。在深入讨论解释的复杂性之前,谨慎的做法是询问世贸组织法庭是否对担保条款有管辖权,以及它是否具有可诉性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Adjudication of the GATT Security Clause: To Be or Not to Be, This is the Question
Amidst the severe crisis the WTO’s crown jewel is facing these days, the WTO tribunals are confronted with another perplexed matter – adjudication of the security exception. In a number of the ongoing disputes the parties invoked national security to justify their trade-restrictive measures. The interpretation of the security exception raises a number of vexed questions. Before delving into the discussion of the interpretative intricacies, it is prudent to inquire whether the WTO tribunals have jurisdiction over the security clause and if it is justiciable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On Juror Decision Making: An Empathic Inquiry Adjudication of the GATT Security Clause: To Be or Not to Be, This is the Question Opportunistic Proposals by Union Shareholders Agency Performance Challenges and Agency Politicization It's Tax Not Trade (Stupid)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1