{"title":"At the Origins of the Dialogue of Epic Novels in the Journal Russian Bulletin (I. S. Turgenev and B. M. Markevich)","authors":"Y. Lebedev","doi":"10.22455/2686-7494-2021-3-3-22-51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the emergence of personal and then creative ties between I. S. Turgenev and B. M. Markevich. It is proved that the novels of Markevich and other members of the “constellation of Moscow writers”, employees of the Russian Bulletin, were created with an attitude towards artistic polemic. The article examines connections and confrontations in the worldview of Turgenev and Markevich, who shared the ideological guidelines of the editor of the “Russian Bulletin” M. N. Katkov. Markevich advocated the state integrity of the country, in addition to Turgenev’s “nihilists” and “superfluous people”, he chose patriotic nobles as literary heroes. In the novel Types of the Past, published in the Russian Bulletin four months after the publication of the novel Smoke, Markevich contrasted Irina and Litvinov with “a virtuous matron” and “exemplary citizens”. Markevich argues with Turgenev’s cult of love as a spontaneous passion, defending Orthodox Christian values. Turgenev’s response to this novel is lost, but Markevich’s reply letter shows that Turgenev subjected him to severe criticism. In the novel Virgin Soil in the person of Nezhdanov, Turgenev gave a polemical answer to Markevich, resolving this conflict in his own way in favor of the hero’s political convictions.","PeriodicalId":359000,"journal":{"name":"Two centuries of the Russian classics","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Two centuries of the Russian classics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22455/2686-7494-2021-3-3-22-51","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
这篇文章考察了i.s.屠格涅夫和b.m.马尔科维奇之间的个人联系和创造性联系的出现。事实证明,马尔科维奇的小说和其他成员的“莫斯科作家星座”,俄罗斯公报的雇员,以一种艺术论战的态度创作。这篇文章考察了屠格涅夫和马尔科维奇世界观中的联系和对抗,他们分享了《俄罗斯公报》(Russian Bulletin)主编M. N. Katkov的意识形态指导方针。马尔科维奇主张国家的完整,除了屠格涅夫的“虚无主义者”和“多余的人”之外,他还选择了爱国贵族作为文学英雄。小说《烟》出版四个月后,马尔科维奇在《俄罗斯公报》上发表了小说《过去的类型》,将伊琳娜和利特维诺夫比作“贤惠的主妇”和“模范公民”。马尔科维奇认为屠格涅夫对爱的崇拜是一种自发的激情,他为东正教的价值观辩护。屠格涅夫对这部小说的回应已经失传,但马尔科维奇的回信表明屠格涅夫对他进行了严厉的批评。在小说《处女地》中,屠格涅夫以涅日达诺夫的身份对马尔科维奇给出了一个有争议的回答,以自己的方式解决了这一冲突,有利于主人公的政治信念。
At the Origins of the Dialogue of Epic Novels in the Journal Russian Bulletin (I. S. Turgenev and B. M. Markevich)
The article examines the emergence of personal and then creative ties between I. S. Turgenev and B. M. Markevich. It is proved that the novels of Markevich and other members of the “constellation of Moscow writers”, employees of the Russian Bulletin, were created with an attitude towards artistic polemic. The article examines connections and confrontations in the worldview of Turgenev and Markevich, who shared the ideological guidelines of the editor of the “Russian Bulletin” M. N. Katkov. Markevich advocated the state integrity of the country, in addition to Turgenev’s “nihilists” and “superfluous people”, he chose patriotic nobles as literary heroes. In the novel Types of the Past, published in the Russian Bulletin four months after the publication of the novel Smoke, Markevich contrasted Irina and Litvinov with “a virtuous matron” and “exemplary citizens”. Markevich argues with Turgenev’s cult of love as a spontaneous passion, defending Orthodox Christian values. Turgenev’s response to this novel is lost, but Markevich’s reply letter shows that Turgenev subjected him to severe criticism. In the novel Virgin Soil in the person of Nezhdanov, Turgenev gave a polemical answer to Markevich, resolving this conflict in his own way in favor of the hero’s political convictions.