{"title":"[关于RU 486的伦理争议:数据和争论]。","authors":"S Reiter-Theil, R Dressel","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>By RU 486 being synthesized (1980) a pharmacological alternative to surgical methods of abortion has been created. Since 1988 Mifepristone is applied for termination of pregnancies under severe control. Major pros and cons in debates about RU 486 in medical publications are analyzed, their relations to central ethical principles being worked out clearly. As consequences of the analysis of arguments the authors formulate four conditions for the use of Mifepristone as method of abortion which should be considered in further research and practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":77110,"journal":{"name":"Diskussionsforum medizinische Ethik","volume":" 6-7","pages":"XXXIII-XXXVII"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Ethical controversy surrounding RU 486: data and arguments].\",\"authors\":\"S Reiter-Theil, R Dressel\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>By RU 486 being synthesized (1980) a pharmacological alternative to surgical methods of abortion has been created. Since 1988 Mifepristone is applied for termination of pregnancies under severe control. Major pros and cons in debates about RU 486 in medical publications are analyzed, their relations to central ethical principles being worked out clearly. As consequences of the analysis of arguments the authors formulate four conditions for the use of Mifepristone as method of abortion which should be considered in further research and practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77110,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diskussionsforum medizinische Ethik\",\"volume\":\" 6-7\",\"pages\":\"XXXIII-XXXVII\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1992-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diskussionsforum medizinische Ethik\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diskussionsforum medizinische Ethik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Ethical controversy surrounding RU 486: data and arguments].
By RU 486 being synthesized (1980) a pharmacological alternative to surgical methods of abortion has been created. Since 1988 Mifepristone is applied for termination of pregnancies under severe control. Major pros and cons in debates about RU 486 in medical publications are analyzed, their relations to central ethical principles being worked out clearly. As consequences of the analysis of arguments the authors formulate four conditions for the use of Mifepristone as method of abortion which should be considered in further research and practice.
分享
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
