{"title":"一种衡量亲贫穷程度的折衷方法","authors":"S. Chakravarty, N. Chattopadhyay","doi":"10.25071/1874-6322.40547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A growth vector is often considered as pro-poor if it generates a reductionin poverty. A second approach to pro-poorness states that growth shouldbe higher for the poor than for the non-poor. In this article, we develop ananalytical approach by considering a compromise between these two notionsof pro-poorness.","PeriodicalId":142300,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Income Distribution®","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Compromise Approach to the Measurement of Pro-Poorness\",\"authors\":\"S. Chakravarty, N. Chattopadhyay\",\"doi\":\"10.25071/1874-6322.40547\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A growth vector is often considered as pro-poor if it generates a reductionin poverty. A second approach to pro-poorness states that growth shouldbe higher for the poor than for the non-poor. In this article, we develop ananalytical approach by considering a compromise between these two notionsof pro-poorness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":142300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Income Distribution®\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Income Distribution®\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25071/1874-6322.40547\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Income Distribution®","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25071/1874-6322.40547","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Compromise Approach to the Measurement of Pro-Poorness
A growth vector is often considered as pro-poor if it generates a reductionin poverty. A second approach to pro-poorness states that growth shouldbe higher for the poor than for the non-poor. In this article, we develop ananalytical approach by considering a compromise between these two notionsof pro-poorness.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
