以正式的方式处理用例场景和文本,作为基于tfm的转换的输入

Erika Nazaruka
{"title":"以正式的方式处理用例场景和文本,作为基于tfm的转换的输入","authors":"Erika Nazaruka","doi":"10.22364/bjmc.2020.8.1.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"TFM (Topological Functioning Model) based transformations start from text fragments as inputs and end with source code. Automated processing of use case scenarios is likely to be more predictable than text in a formal style thanks to their structure. The goal of the research is to understand whether the differences in processing these two text forms are essential for getting core elements of a TFM, or even a structured form has essential limitations. The theoretical results illustrate that use case specifications may have more structured and less structured formats. Even in the former format, use case steps may contain explanations and even text fragments in a formal style that increases unpredictability. Analysis of text in the both cases requires part-of-speech tagging, lemmas, constituency and dependency parsing, coreference resolution, and language pattern matching. Thus, structuring the initial documents is questionable but cases when they are to be managed in projects.","PeriodicalId":431209,"journal":{"name":"Balt. J. Mod. Comput.","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Processing Use Case Scenarios and Text in a Formal Style as Inputs for TFM-based Transformations\",\"authors\":\"Erika Nazaruka\",\"doi\":\"10.22364/bjmc.2020.8.1.03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"TFM (Topological Functioning Model) based transformations start from text fragments as inputs and end with source code. Automated processing of use case scenarios is likely to be more predictable than text in a formal style thanks to their structure. The goal of the research is to understand whether the differences in processing these two text forms are essential for getting core elements of a TFM, or even a structured form has essential limitations. The theoretical results illustrate that use case specifications may have more structured and less structured formats. Even in the former format, use case steps may contain explanations and even text fragments in a formal style that increases unpredictability. Analysis of text in the both cases requires part-of-speech tagging, lemmas, constituency and dependency parsing, coreference resolution, and language pattern matching. Thus, structuring the initial documents is questionable but cases when they are to be managed in projects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":431209,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Balt. J. Mod. Comput.\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Balt. J. Mod. Comput.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22364/bjmc.2020.8.1.03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Balt. J. Mod. Comput.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22364/bjmc.2020.8.1.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

基于TFM(拓扑功能模型)的转换从作为输入的文本片段开始,以源代码结束。由于它们的结构,用例场景的自动化处理可能比正式风格的文本更可预测。本研究的目的是了解处理这两种文本形式的差异是否对获得TFM的核心元素至关重要,或者甚至结构化形式也存在本质限制。理论结果表明,用例规范可能具有更多的结构化格式和更少的结构化格式。即使在前一种格式中,用例步骤也可能以增加不可预测性的正式风格包含解释甚至文本片段。这两种情况下的文本分析都需要词性标注、引理、成分和依赖关系解析、共同引用解析和语言模式匹配。因此,初始文件的结构是有问题的,但在项目中管理它们的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Processing Use Case Scenarios and Text in a Formal Style as Inputs for TFM-based Transformations
TFM (Topological Functioning Model) based transformations start from text fragments as inputs and end with source code. Automated processing of use case scenarios is likely to be more predictable than text in a formal style thanks to their structure. The goal of the research is to understand whether the differences in processing these two text forms are essential for getting core elements of a TFM, or even a structured form has essential limitations. The theoretical results illustrate that use case specifications may have more structured and less structured formats. Even in the former format, use case steps may contain explanations and even text fragments in a formal style that increases unpredictability. Analysis of text in the both cases requires part-of-speech tagging, lemmas, constituency and dependency parsing, coreference resolution, and language pattern matching. Thus, structuring the initial documents is questionable but cases when they are to be managed in projects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On the Accuracy of Edge Detectors in Number Plate Extraction Visual Diagrammatic Queries in ViziQuer: Overview and Implementation From Zero to Production: Baltic-Ukrainian Machine Translation Systems to Aid Refugees Similarity of Sentence Representations in Multilingual LMs: Resolving Conflicting Literature and a Case Study of Baltic Languages The Combinatorial Analysis of n-Gram Dictionaries, Coverage and Information Entropy based on the Web Corpus of English
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1