哪个帖子会给你留下最深刻的印象?:基于Facebook个人资料中视觉和文本线索的印象形成

Ayellet Pelled, T. Zilberstein, Eran Pick, Yael Patkin, Alona Tsironlikov, Nurit Tal-Or
{"title":"哪个帖子会给你留下最深刻的印象?:基于Facebook个人资料中视觉和文本线索的印象形成","authors":"Ayellet Pelled, T. Zilberstein, Eran Pick, Yael Patkin, Alona Tsironlikov, Nurit Tal-Or","doi":"10.1145/2930971.2930997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The existing research presents ambivalent evidence regarding the significance of visual cues, as opposed to textual cues, in the process of impression formation. While textual information might poses a stronger effect due to its solid and unambiguous character, visual information may have a stronger effect due to its vividness and immediate absorption. This debate is particularly relevant in the context of online social networks, as they are constructed on the sharing of textual and visual elements between their users. Two consecutive online studies test the main research question: Which elements of one's Facebook profile have a more significant influence on impression formation- pictures or texts? Study 1 found that outside the context of Facebook, textual cues were more dominant in the process of impression formation. Study 2, which tested impression formation via Facebook, further corroborated this result; suggesting that the textual cues are also dominant in the context of online profiles. Moreover, these effects were influenced by individual characteristics of the participants, such as 'need for cognition', in a manner that individuals with a high need for cognition placed more emphasis on textual cues. Amount of 'likes' also influenced the impression formation, especially when the profile owner was perceived as manipulative. Additional interactions and further implication are discussed.","PeriodicalId":227482,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 7th 2016 International Conference on Social Media & Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Which Post Will Impress the Most?: Impression Formation Based on Visual and Textual Cues in Facebook Profiles\",\"authors\":\"Ayellet Pelled, T. Zilberstein, Eran Pick, Yael Patkin, Alona Tsironlikov, Nurit Tal-Or\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2930971.2930997\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The existing research presents ambivalent evidence regarding the significance of visual cues, as opposed to textual cues, in the process of impression formation. While textual information might poses a stronger effect due to its solid and unambiguous character, visual information may have a stronger effect due to its vividness and immediate absorption. This debate is particularly relevant in the context of online social networks, as they are constructed on the sharing of textual and visual elements between their users. Two consecutive online studies test the main research question: Which elements of one's Facebook profile have a more significant influence on impression formation- pictures or texts? Study 1 found that outside the context of Facebook, textual cues were more dominant in the process of impression formation. Study 2, which tested impression formation via Facebook, further corroborated this result; suggesting that the textual cues are also dominant in the context of online profiles. Moreover, these effects were influenced by individual characteristics of the participants, such as 'need for cognition', in a manner that individuals with a high need for cognition placed more emphasis on textual cues. Amount of 'likes' also influenced the impression formation, especially when the profile owner was perceived as manipulative. Additional interactions and further implication are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":227482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 7th 2016 International Conference on Social Media & Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 7th 2016 International Conference on Social Media & Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2930971.2930997\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 7th 2016 International Conference on Social Media & Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2930971.2930997","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

现有的研究对视觉线索在印象形成过程中的重要性提出了矛盾的证据,而不是文本线索。文本信息因其坚实、明确的特点而具有更强的效果,而视觉信息因其生动、易于吸收而具有更强的效果。这一争论在在线社交网络的背景下尤为重要,因为它们是建立在用户之间文本和视觉元素共享的基础上的。两个连续的在线研究测试了主要的研究问题:一个人的Facebook资料中哪一个元素对印象形成的影响更大——图片还是文字?研究1发现,在Facebook的语境之外,文本线索在印象形成过程中更占主导地位。研究2测试了通过Facebook形成的印象,进一步证实了这一结果;这表明文字线索在网上个人资料中也占主导地位。此外,这些效应还受到参与者的个体特征的影响,比如“认知需求”,在某种程度上,认知需求高的个体更强调文本线索。“喜欢”的数量也会影响印象的形成,尤其是当个人资料的所有者被认为是操纵者时。讨论了其他相互作用和进一步的含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Which Post Will Impress the Most?: Impression Formation Based on Visual and Textual Cues in Facebook Profiles
The existing research presents ambivalent evidence regarding the significance of visual cues, as opposed to textual cues, in the process of impression formation. While textual information might poses a stronger effect due to its solid and unambiguous character, visual information may have a stronger effect due to its vividness and immediate absorption. This debate is particularly relevant in the context of online social networks, as they are constructed on the sharing of textual and visual elements between their users. Two consecutive online studies test the main research question: Which elements of one's Facebook profile have a more significant influence on impression formation- pictures or texts? Study 1 found that outside the context of Facebook, textual cues were more dominant in the process of impression formation. Study 2, which tested impression formation via Facebook, further corroborated this result; suggesting that the textual cues are also dominant in the context of online profiles. Moreover, these effects were influenced by individual characteristics of the participants, such as 'need for cognition', in a manner that individuals with a high need for cognition placed more emphasis on textual cues. Amount of 'likes' also influenced the impression formation, especially when the profile owner was perceived as manipulative. Additional interactions and further implication are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Twitter Adoption in U.S. Legislatures: A Fifty-State Study The Roles of Sensation Seeking and Gratifications Sought in Social Networking Apps Use and Attendant Sexual Behaviors How Twitter reveals Cities within Cities The Method to the Madness: The 2012 United States Presidential Election Twitter Corpus Introduction to the 2016 International Conference on Social Media and Society
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1