关于方法的命名:对专业开发人员的调查

Reem S. Alsuhaibani, Christian D. Newman, M. J. Decker, M. Collard, Jonathan I. Maletic
{"title":"关于方法的命名:对专业开发人员的调查","authors":"Reem S. Alsuhaibani, Christian D. Newman, M. J. Decker, M. Collard, Jonathan I. Maletic","doi":"10.1109/ICSE43902.2021.00061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper describes the results of a large (+1100 responses) survey of professional software developers concerning standards for naming source code methods. The various standards for source code method names are derived from and supported in the software engineering literature. The goal of the survey is to determine if there is a general consensus among developers that the standards are accepted and used in practice. Additionally, the paper examines factors such as years of experience and programming language knowledge in the context of survey responses. The survey results show that participants very much agree about the importance of various standards and how they apply to names and that years of experience and the programming language has almost no effect on their responses. The results imply that the given standards are both valid and to a large degree complete. The work provides a foundation for automated method name assessment during development and code reviews.","PeriodicalId":305167,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE/ACM 43rd International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE)","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the Naming of Methods: A Survey of Professional Developers\",\"authors\":\"Reem S. Alsuhaibani, Christian D. Newman, M. J. Decker, M. Collard, Jonathan I. Maletic\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICSE43902.2021.00061\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper describes the results of a large (+1100 responses) survey of professional software developers concerning standards for naming source code methods. The various standards for source code method names are derived from and supported in the software engineering literature. The goal of the survey is to determine if there is a general consensus among developers that the standards are accepted and used in practice. Additionally, the paper examines factors such as years of experience and programming language knowledge in the context of survey responses. The survey results show that participants very much agree about the importance of various standards and how they apply to names and that years of experience and the programming language has almost no effect on their responses. The results imply that the given standards are both valid and to a large degree complete. The work provides a foundation for automated method name assessment during development and code reviews.\",\"PeriodicalId\":305167,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 IEEE/ACM 43rd International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE)\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 IEEE/ACM 43rd International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE43902.2021.00061\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE/ACM 43rd International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE43902.2021.00061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

本文描述了对专业软件开发人员关于命名源代码方法标准的大型(+1100个响应)调查的结果。源代码方法名的各种标准来源于软件工程文献,并得到软件工程文献的支持。调查的目标是确定在开发人员中是否有一个普遍的共识,即标准被接受并在实践中使用。此外,本文还考察了诸如多年经验和编程语言知识等因素在调查回应的背景下。调查结果显示,参与者非常认同各种标准的重要性,以及这些标准如何适用于名字,而且多年的经验和编程语言对他们的回答几乎没有影响。结果表明,所给出的标准是有效的,并且在很大程度上是完整的。这项工作为开发和代码审查期间的自动化方法名称评估提供了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
On the Naming of Methods: A Survey of Professional Developers
This paper describes the results of a large (+1100 responses) survey of professional software developers concerning standards for naming source code methods. The various standards for source code method names are derived from and supported in the software engineering literature. The goal of the survey is to determine if there is a general consensus among developers that the standards are accepted and used in practice. Additionally, the paper examines factors such as years of experience and programming language knowledge in the context of survey responses. The survey results show that participants very much agree about the importance of various standards and how they apply to names and that years of experience and the programming language has almost no effect on their responses. The results imply that the given standards are both valid and to a large degree complete. The work provides a foundation for automated method name assessment during development and code reviews.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
MuDelta: Delta-Oriented Mutation Testing at Commit Time Verifying Determinism in Sequential Programs Data-Oriented Differential Testing of Object-Relational Mapping Systems IoT Bugs and Development Challenges Onboarding vs. Diversity, Productivity and Quality — Empirical Study of the OpenStack Ecosystem
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1