移动应用的可用性评估方法:系统的文献综述

Adi Nugroho, P. Santosa, Rudy Hartanto
{"title":"移动应用的可用性评估方法:系统的文献综述","authors":"Adi Nugroho, P. Santosa, Rudy Hartanto","doi":"10.1109/ISITDI55734.2022.9944401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At this time, mobile devices have an important role because it provides changes for users. Not only making calls, but many features and applications are used to make work easier. Mobile application development brings new challenges to mobile devices, such as usability context when users use mobile applications. Usability is an important factor in mobile applications' role in making them easy to use and efficient. User Interface (UI) and User Experience (UX) has a critical role in software development. It has a function that is one of the keys to the effectiveness of using the software. This study aims to find popular usability evaluation on mobile applications with the help of a Systematic Literature Review (SLR). The usability evaluation process of mobile applications is carried out with a systematic literature review of 22 papers. The results show that 73% of the methods used are usability testing, 23% heuristic evaluations, and 4% are user satisfaction usability evaluations. To conduct usability evaluation on mobile applications, usability testing is carried out in five stages, involves participants, and has the characteristics of Effectiveness, Efficiency, and User Satisfaction. Meanwhile, in heuristic evaluation, experts must be involved in evaluating the user interfaces. This study proposes a mixed method of usability testing and heuristic evaluation in conducting usability evaluation on mobile applications. This method is expected to provide effective and objective usability issues from the perspective of users and experts in improving User Interface (UI) and User Experience (UX).","PeriodicalId":312644,"journal":{"name":"2022 International Symposium on Information Technology and Digital Innovation (ISITDI)","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Usability Evaluation Methods of Mobile Applications: A Systematic Literature Review\",\"authors\":\"Adi Nugroho, P. Santosa, Rudy Hartanto\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISITDI55734.2022.9944401\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"At this time, mobile devices have an important role because it provides changes for users. Not only making calls, but many features and applications are used to make work easier. Mobile application development brings new challenges to mobile devices, such as usability context when users use mobile applications. Usability is an important factor in mobile applications' role in making them easy to use and efficient. User Interface (UI) and User Experience (UX) has a critical role in software development. It has a function that is one of the keys to the effectiveness of using the software. This study aims to find popular usability evaluation on mobile applications with the help of a Systematic Literature Review (SLR). The usability evaluation process of mobile applications is carried out with a systematic literature review of 22 papers. The results show that 73% of the methods used are usability testing, 23% heuristic evaluations, and 4% are user satisfaction usability evaluations. To conduct usability evaluation on mobile applications, usability testing is carried out in five stages, involves participants, and has the characteristics of Effectiveness, Efficiency, and User Satisfaction. Meanwhile, in heuristic evaluation, experts must be involved in evaluating the user interfaces. This study proposes a mixed method of usability testing and heuristic evaluation in conducting usability evaluation on mobile applications. This method is expected to provide effective and objective usability issues from the perspective of users and experts in improving User Interface (UI) and User Experience (UX).\",\"PeriodicalId\":312644,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 International Symposium on Information Technology and Digital Innovation (ISITDI)\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 International Symposium on Information Technology and Digital Innovation (ISITDI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISITDI55734.2022.9944401\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 International Symposium on Information Technology and Digital Innovation (ISITDI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISITDI55734.2022.9944401","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

此时,移动设备扮演着重要的角色,因为它为用户提供了变化。不仅可以打电话,还可以使用许多功能和应用程序来简化工作。移动应用程序开发给移动设备带来了新的挑战,比如用户使用移动应用程序时的可用性环境。可用性是移动应用程序的一个重要因素,它可以使它们易于使用和高效。用户界面(UI)和用户体验(UX)在软件开发中起着至关重要的作用。它有一个功能,这是使用软件的有效性的关键之一。本研究旨在借助系统文献综述(SLR)找到流行的移动应用程序可用性评估。通过对22篇论文的系统文献综述,对移动应用程序的可用性评估过程进行了研究。结果表明,73%的方法是可用性测试,23%是启发式评估,4%是用户满意度可用性评估。为了对移动应用进行可用性评估,可用性测试分为五个阶段,参与者参与,具有有效性、效率和用户满意度的特征。同时,在启发式评价中,必须有专家参与对用户界面的评价。本研究提出了一种可用性测试与启发式评估相结合的方法对移动应用进行可用性评估。该方法有望从用户和专家的角度提供有效和客观的可用性问题,以改善用户界面(UI)和用户体验(UX)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Usability Evaluation Methods of Mobile Applications: A Systematic Literature Review
At this time, mobile devices have an important role because it provides changes for users. Not only making calls, but many features and applications are used to make work easier. Mobile application development brings new challenges to mobile devices, such as usability context when users use mobile applications. Usability is an important factor in mobile applications' role in making them easy to use and efficient. User Interface (UI) and User Experience (UX) has a critical role in software development. It has a function that is one of the keys to the effectiveness of using the software. This study aims to find popular usability evaluation on mobile applications with the help of a Systematic Literature Review (SLR). The usability evaluation process of mobile applications is carried out with a systematic literature review of 22 papers. The results show that 73% of the methods used are usability testing, 23% heuristic evaluations, and 4% are user satisfaction usability evaluations. To conduct usability evaluation on mobile applications, usability testing is carried out in five stages, involves participants, and has the characteristics of Effectiveness, Efficiency, and User Satisfaction. Meanwhile, in heuristic evaluation, experts must be involved in evaluating the user interfaces. This study proposes a mixed method of usability testing and heuristic evaluation in conducting usability evaluation on mobile applications. This method is expected to provide effective and objective usability issues from the perspective of users and experts in improving User Interface (UI) and User Experience (UX).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An RFID-Based Battery-Less Vibration Monitoring System for Electrical Appliances Gender and Intent Classification From Finger Swiping Behaviours on Gesture Keyboards Using LSTM Comparison of Naïve Bayes, C4.5 and K-Nearest Neighbor for Covid-19 Data Classification Gamification Methods of Game-Based Learning Applications in Medical Competence: A Systematic Literature Review The Implementation of Business Intelligence on Visualisation of Transaction Data Analysis using Dashboard System Case Study: XYZ Convenience Store
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1