贫困排序和家庭内部不平等:失落的公理

Eugenio Peluso, A. Trannoy
{"title":"贫困排序和家庭内部不平等:失落的公理","authors":"Eugenio Peluso, A. Trannoy","doi":"10.25071/1874-6322.23678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We investigate under which conditions it is possible to infer the\nevolution of poverty at the individual level from the knowledge of\npoverty among households. Poverty measurement is approached by\nthe poverty orderings introduced by Foster and Shorrocks (1988). The\nanalysis is based on a reduced form of household bargaining (Peluso\nand Trannoy, 2007) and provides results in terms of preservation of\npoverty orderings. We point out the main analogies and differences\nbetween inequality and poverty assessment, expressing them in terms\nof empirically testable conditions. In particular, knowing the change\nin poverty at the household level is not sufficient to deduce a similar\nchange in poverty at the individual level. We need to know the change\nin the household income distributions far beyond their poverty line.\nThe focus axiom does not hold in this context.","PeriodicalId":142300,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Income Distribution®","volume":"202 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Poverty orderings and intra-household inequality: The Lost Axiom\",\"authors\":\"Eugenio Peluso, A. Trannoy\",\"doi\":\"10.25071/1874-6322.23678\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We investigate under which conditions it is possible to infer the\\nevolution of poverty at the individual level from the knowledge of\\npoverty among households. Poverty measurement is approached by\\nthe poverty orderings introduced by Foster and Shorrocks (1988). The\\nanalysis is based on a reduced form of household bargaining (Peluso\\nand Trannoy, 2007) and provides results in terms of preservation of\\npoverty orderings. We point out the main analogies and differences\\nbetween inequality and poverty assessment, expressing them in terms\\nof empirically testable conditions. In particular, knowing the change\\nin poverty at the household level is not sufficient to deduce a similar\\nchange in poverty at the individual level. We need to know the change\\nin the household income distributions far beyond their poverty line.\\nThe focus axiom does not hold in this context.\",\"PeriodicalId\":142300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Income Distribution®\",\"volume\":\"202 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Income Distribution®\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25071/1874-6322.23678\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Income Distribution®","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25071/1874-6322.23678","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

我们研究了在哪些条件下可以从家庭贫困的知识中推断出个人层面上贫困的演变。贫困测量是由Foster和Shorrocks(1988)提出的贫困排序方法。该分析基于一种简化形式的家庭议价(Pelusoand Trannoy, 2007),并提供了关于维持贫困秩序的结果。我们指出了不平等和贫困评估之间的主要相似之处和差异,并用经验可检验的条件来表达它们。特别是,了解家庭层面的贫困变化不足以推断出个人层面的贫困变化。我们需要了解远远超出贫困线的家庭收入分配的变化。焦点公理在这种情况下不成立。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Poverty orderings and intra-household inequality: The Lost Axiom
We investigate under which conditions it is possible to infer the evolution of poverty at the individual level from the knowledge of poverty among households. Poverty measurement is approached by the poverty orderings introduced by Foster and Shorrocks (1988). The analysis is based on a reduced form of household bargaining (Peluso and Trannoy, 2007) and provides results in terms of preservation of poverty orderings. We point out the main analogies and differences between inequality and poverty assessment, expressing them in terms of empirically testable conditions. In particular, knowing the change in poverty at the household level is not sufficient to deduce a similar change in poverty at the individual level. We need to know the change in the household income distributions far beyond their poverty line. The focus axiom does not hold in this context.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Axioms and Intuitions about Societal Inequality Does vulnerable employment narrow income inequality? Evidence from developing countries The Impact of Microfinance on Poverty and Income Inequality Return Migration and Earnings Mobility in the Middle East and North Africa The micro-macro gap for capital income in the Eurozone
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1