林产品作为安全网,森林砍伐和公地悲剧

P. Delacote
{"title":"林产品作为安全网,森林砍伐和公地悲剧","authors":"P. Delacote","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1368683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Non-timber forest product (NTFP) are commonly used by poor agricultural house-holds of developing countries to smooth their consumption and to cope with agricultural risk. This paper explores the potential implications of this safety-net use on the land-use choice and labor allocation. We consider that the land-use is a long-run choice variable, while labor allocation is a short-term choice variable. In this context, it appears that risk reduction may have two opposite implications. In the short run, risk reduction tends to reduce the pressure on common resource extraction, while in the long run, risk reduction may tend to increase deforestation.","PeriodicalId":346805,"journal":{"name":"Natural Resources Law & Policy eJournal","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Forest Products as Safety Net, Deforestation and the Tragedy of the Commons\",\"authors\":\"P. Delacote\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1368683\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Non-timber forest product (NTFP) are commonly used by poor agricultural house-holds of developing countries to smooth their consumption and to cope with agricultural risk. This paper explores the potential implications of this safety-net use on the land-use choice and labor allocation. We consider that the land-use is a long-run choice variable, while labor allocation is a short-term choice variable. In this context, it appears that risk reduction may have two opposite implications. In the short run, risk reduction tends to reduce the pressure on common resource extraction, while in the long run, risk reduction may tend to increase deforestation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":346805,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Natural Resources Law & Policy eJournal\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Natural Resources Law & Policy eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1368683\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Resources Law & Policy eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1368683","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

发展中国家的贫困农户通常使用非木材林产品来平稳消费和应对农业风险。本文探讨了这种社会保障网络的使用对土地使用选择和劳动力配置的潜在影响。我们认为土地利用是一个长期选择变量,而劳动力配置是一个短期选择变量。在这种情况下,减少风险似乎有两个相反的含义。从短期来看,减少风险往往会减少对共同资源开采的压力,而从长期来看,减少风险可能会增加森林砍伐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Forest Products as Safety Net, Deforestation and the Tragedy of the Commons
Non-timber forest product (NTFP) are commonly used by poor agricultural house-holds of developing countries to smooth their consumption and to cope with agricultural risk. This paper explores the potential implications of this safety-net use on the land-use choice and labor allocation. We consider that the land-use is a long-run choice variable, while labor allocation is a short-term choice variable. In this context, it appears that risk reduction may have two opposite implications. In the short run, risk reduction tends to reduce the pressure on common resource extraction, while in the long run, risk reduction may tend to increase deforestation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A tributação e o desenvolvimento sustentável (Taxation and Sustainable Development) U.S. Supreme Court Issues a Major Ruling on NPDES Permits Legal and Policy Issues in the Development of Nigeria’s Mining Sector: Charting the Way Forward A Cost Benefit Analysis of Shale Gas Well Bonding Systems in Pennsylvania Governance of Ecosystem Services Across Scales in Bangladesh
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1