t -验证者:验证事实陈述的真实性

Xian Li, W. Meng, Clement T. Yu
{"title":"t -验证者:验证事实陈述的真实性","authors":"Xian Li, W. Meng, Clement T. Yu","doi":"10.1109/ICDE.2011.5767859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Web has become the most popular place for people to acquire information. Unfortunately, it is widely recognized that the Web contains a significant amount of untruthful information. As a result, good tools are needed to help Web users determine the truthfulness of certain information. In this paper, we propose a two-step method that aims to determine whether a given statement is truthful, and if it is not, find out the truthful statement most related to the given statement. In the first step, we try to find a small number of alternative statements of the same topic as the given statement and make sure that one of these statements is truthful. In the second step, we identify the truthful statement from the given statement and the alternative statements. Both steps heavily rely on analysing various features extracted from the search results returned by a popular search engine for appropriate queries. Our experimental results show the best variation of the proposed method can achieve a precision of about 90%.","PeriodicalId":332374,"journal":{"name":"2011 IEEE 27th International Conference on Data Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"58","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"T-verifier: Verifying truthfulness of fact statements\",\"authors\":\"Xian Li, W. Meng, Clement T. Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICDE.2011.5767859\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Web has become the most popular place for people to acquire information. Unfortunately, it is widely recognized that the Web contains a significant amount of untruthful information. As a result, good tools are needed to help Web users determine the truthfulness of certain information. In this paper, we propose a two-step method that aims to determine whether a given statement is truthful, and if it is not, find out the truthful statement most related to the given statement. In the first step, we try to find a small number of alternative statements of the same topic as the given statement and make sure that one of these statements is truthful. In the second step, we identify the truthful statement from the given statement and the alternative statements. Both steps heavily rely on analysing various features extracted from the search results returned by a popular search engine for appropriate queries. Our experimental results show the best variation of the proposed method can achieve a precision of about 90%.\",\"PeriodicalId\":332374,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 IEEE 27th International Conference on Data Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"58\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 IEEE 27th International Conference on Data Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDE.2011.5767859\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 IEEE 27th International Conference on Data Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDE.2011.5767859","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 58

摘要

网络已经成为人们获取信息最流行的地方。不幸的是,人们普遍认为网络包含大量不真实的信息。因此,需要好的工具来帮助网络用户确定某些信息的真实性。在本文中,我们提出了一种两步法,旨在确定给定陈述是否真实,如果不是,找出与给定陈述最相关的真实陈述。在第一步中,我们尝试找到少量与给定语句相同主题的替代语句,并确保其中一个语句是真实的。在第二步,我们从给定的陈述和替代陈述中识别真实陈述。这两个步骤都严重依赖于分析从流行搜索引擎返回的搜索结果中提取的各种特征,以获得适当的查询。实验结果表明,该方法的最佳变化精度可达90%左右。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
T-verifier: Verifying truthfulness of fact statements
The Web has become the most popular place for people to acquire information. Unfortunately, it is widely recognized that the Web contains a significant amount of untruthful information. As a result, good tools are needed to help Web users determine the truthfulness of certain information. In this paper, we propose a two-step method that aims to determine whether a given statement is truthful, and if it is not, find out the truthful statement most related to the given statement. In the first step, we try to find a small number of alternative statements of the same topic as the given statement and make sure that one of these statements is truthful. In the second step, we identify the truthful statement from the given statement and the alternative statements. Both steps heavily rely on analysing various features extracted from the search results returned by a popular search engine for appropriate queries. Our experimental results show the best variation of the proposed method can achieve a precision of about 90%.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Advanced search, visualization and tagging of sensor metadata Bidirectional mining of non-redundant recurrent rules from a sequence database Web-scale information extraction with vertex Characteristic sets: Accurate cardinality estimation for RDF queries with multiple joins Dynamic prioritization of database queries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1