婴幼儿正常肠道菌群的发育及其临床意义

H. Yoshioka, K. Fujita, H. Sakata, K. Murono, K. Iseki
{"title":"婴幼儿正常肠道菌群的发育及其临床意义","authors":"H. Yoshioka, K. Fujita, H. Sakata, K. Murono, K. Iseki","doi":"10.12938/BIFIDUS1982.10.1_11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We studied development of bacterial flora in the stool in breast-fed and bottlefed infants. Subjects and methods. Stools of 13 healthy newborn infants (six were breast-fed and seven were bottle-fed) were cultured. Stool samples were taken daily for six days after birth. Another culture was performed at one and three months of age, as the infants returned to the Well-Baby Clinic for a routine check-up. The stool was obtained directly from the rectum using a glass tube with rounded top and a side hole. The culture was performed within two hours of stool collection. A series of media were employed for anaerobic culture. Viande et de Levures medium with 0.2% glucose (VLG) was used for total bacterial count, VLG medium containing 7.5 ƒÊg/ml of vancomycin and 5 ƒÊg/ml of gentamicin for Bacteroides spp., and a modified Petuely's selective medium with nalidixic acid (MPN) was used for bifidobacteria (1). These media were prepared in test tubes with tight stoppers under \"pre-reduced anaerobically sterilized\" conditions. Procedures of anaerobic sample preparation and culture were performed by the method described by Holdeman et al (2). Air in the media and culture tubes was always substituted with CO2 using a CO2-gas stream. All cultures were done quantitatively and grown colonies were read and counted. Results. Changes in the count of organisms for individual bacterial groups are shown in Fig. 1 (3, 4). The count is described in terms of common logarithms of the bacterial count per g of feces (for example, a bacterial count of 108 per g of feces is expressed as log 8/g). On the day after birth, a mean organism total of log 9.0•}1.1/g of feces was measured. Enterobacteria were the predominant organism, followed by smaller numbers of enterococci, staphylococci, and Bacteroides. The number of entero-","PeriodicalId":414713,"journal":{"name":"Bifidobacteria and Microflora","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"54","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of the Normal Intestinal Flora and Clinical Significance in Infants and Children\",\"authors\":\"H. Yoshioka, K. Fujita, H. Sakata, K. Murono, K. Iseki\",\"doi\":\"10.12938/BIFIDUS1982.10.1_11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We studied development of bacterial flora in the stool in breast-fed and bottlefed infants. Subjects and methods. Stools of 13 healthy newborn infants (six were breast-fed and seven were bottle-fed) were cultured. Stool samples were taken daily for six days after birth. Another culture was performed at one and three months of age, as the infants returned to the Well-Baby Clinic for a routine check-up. The stool was obtained directly from the rectum using a glass tube with rounded top and a side hole. The culture was performed within two hours of stool collection. A series of media were employed for anaerobic culture. Viande et de Levures medium with 0.2% glucose (VLG) was used for total bacterial count, VLG medium containing 7.5 ƒÊg/ml of vancomycin and 5 ƒÊg/ml of gentamicin for Bacteroides spp., and a modified Petuely's selective medium with nalidixic acid (MPN) was used for bifidobacteria (1). These media were prepared in test tubes with tight stoppers under \\\"pre-reduced anaerobically sterilized\\\" conditions. Procedures of anaerobic sample preparation and culture were performed by the method described by Holdeman et al (2). Air in the media and culture tubes was always substituted with CO2 using a CO2-gas stream. All cultures were done quantitatively and grown colonies were read and counted. Results. Changes in the count of organisms for individual bacterial groups are shown in Fig. 1 (3, 4). The count is described in terms of common logarithms of the bacterial count per g of feces (for example, a bacterial count of 108 per g of feces is expressed as log 8/g). On the day after birth, a mean organism total of log 9.0•}1.1/g of feces was measured. Enterobacteria were the predominant organism, followed by smaller numbers of enterococci, staphylococci, and Bacteroides. The number of entero-\",\"PeriodicalId\":414713,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bifidobacteria and Microflora\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"54\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bifidobacteria and Microflora\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12938/BIFIDUS1982.10.1_11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bifidobacteria and Microflora","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12938/BIFIDUS1982.10.1_11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 54

摘要

我们研究了母乳喂养和奶瓶喂养婴儿粪便中细菌菌群的发育。研究对象和方法。对13名健康新生儿(6名母乳喂养,7名奶瓶喂养)的粪便进行了培养。出生后6天每天采集粪便样本。另一种培养是在婴儿1个月和3个月大时进行的,当婴儿回到Well-Baby诊所进行常规检查时。粪便是直接从直肠获得的,使用一个圆形顶部和侧孔的玻璃管。粪便收集后两小时内进行培养。采用一系列培养基进行厌氧培养。细菌总数用含有0.2%葡萄糖的Viande et de Levures培养基(VLG),拟杆菌用含有7.5 ƒÊg/ml万古霉素和5 ƒÊg/ml庆大霉素的VLG培养基,双歧杆菌用含有纳利迪酸(MPN)的改良Petuely选择性培养基(1)。这些培养基在“预还原厌氧灭菌”条件下,在带密封塞的试管中制备。厌氧样品制备和培养过程由Holdeman等人(2)描述的方法进行。培养基和培养管中的空气总是用CO2-气体流代替CO2。所有的培养都是定量的,生长的菌落被读取和计数。结果。单个细菌群的微生物数量变化如图1(3,4)所示。计数以每克粪便中细菌数量的常用对数来描述(例如,每克粪便中细菌数量为108,表示为log 8/g)。出生后第1天,测定粪便中平均微生物总数为log 9.0•}1.1/g。以肠杆菌为主,其次是数量较少的肠球菌、葡萄球菌和拟杆菌。进入的数量
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development of the Normal Intestinal Flora and Clinical Significance in Infants and Children
We studied development of bacterial flora in the stool in breast-fed and bottlefed infants. Subjects and methods. Stools of 13 healthy newborn infants (six were breast-fed and seven were bottle-fed) were cultured. Stool samples were taken daily for six days after birth. Another culture was performed at one and three months of age, as the infants returned to the Well-Baby Clinic for a routine check-up. The stool was obtained directly from the rectum using a glass tube with rounded top and a side hole. The culture was performed within two hours of stool collection. A series of media were employed for anaerobic culture. Viande et de Levures medium with 0.2% glucose (VLG) was used for total bacterial count, VLG medium containing 7.5 ƒÊg/ml of vancomycin and 5 ƒÊg/ml of gentamicin for Bacteroides spp., and a modified Petuely's selective medium with nalidixic acid (MPN) was used for bifidobacteria (1). These media were prepared in test tubes with tight stoppers under "pre-reduced anaerobically sterilized" conditions. Procedures of anaerobic sample preparation and culture were performed by the method described by Holdeman et al (2). Air in the media and culture tubes was always substituted with CO2 using a CO2-gas stream. All cultures were done quantitatively and grown colonies were read and counted. Results. Changes in the count of organisms for individual bacterial groups are shown in Fig. 1 (3, 4). The count is described in terms of common logarithms of the bacterial count per g of feces (for example, a bacterial count of 108 per g of feces is expressed as log 8/g). On the day after birth, a mean organism total of log 9.0•}1.1/g of feces was measured. Enterobacteria were the predominant organism, followed by smaller numbers of enterococci, staphylococci, and Bacteroides. The number of entero-
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Enhancement of Host Resistance to Bacterial and Viral Infections by Lactobacillus casei Ecology of Bifidobacterium in the Human Intestinal Flora Comparison of Antimicrobial Susceptibility of the Bacteroides vulgatus and B. fragilis Strains Isolated from Feces or Bowel Tissue Specimens of Patients with Ulcerative Colitis and Those from Feces of Healthy Adults Tumor-suppressive effect of a cell wall preparation, WPG, from Bifidobacterium infantis in germfree and flora-bearing mice Phenotypic Characteristics in Distinguishing Clostridium butyricum from Clostridium beijerinckii
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1