各州电影税收抵免的比较

ERN: National Pub Date : 2021-07-21 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3890522
Emily Gillenwater
{"title":"各州电影税收抵免的比较","authors":"Emily Gillenwater","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3890522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the United States, there are essentially three tax regimes when it comes to film tax credits. The United States currently does not have a federal filming credit, unlike Canada. Because of this, states have an open market to compete in which leads to a cutthroat competition. This paper will discuss the current regimes, how they work, and the benefits each has. The second half of this paper is a comparison of the most \"successful\" regime in Georgia to North Carolina. The conclusion focuses on how North Carolina can exploit weaknesses within the Georgia regime.","PeriodicalId":221919,"journal":{"name":"ERN: National","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Film Tax Credits Across State Lines\",\"authors\":\"Emily Gillenwater\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3890522\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the United States, there are essentially three tax regimes when it comes to film tax credits. The United States currently does not have a federal filming credit, unlike Canada. Because of this, states have an open market to compete in which leads to a cutthroat competition. This paper will discuss the current regimes, how they work, and the benefits each has. The second half of this paper is a comparison of the most \\\"successful\\\" regime in Georgia to North Carolina. The conclusion focuses on how North Carolina can exploit weaknesses within the Georgia regime.\",\"PeriodicalId\":221919,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: National\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: National\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3890522\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: National","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3890522","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在美国,就电影税收抵免而言,基本上有三种税收制度。与加拿大不同,美国目前没有联邦电影信贷。正因为如此,各州有一个开放的市场来竞争,这导致了残酷的竞争。本文将讨论当前的制度,它们是如何运作的,以及每个制度的好处。本文的后半部分比较了乔治亚州和北卡罗来纳州最“成功”的政体。结论集中于北卡罗来纳州如何利用格鲁吉亚政权内部的弱点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of Film Tax Credits Across State Lines
In the United States, there are essentially three tax regimes when it comes to film tax credits. The United States currently does not have a federal filming credit, unlike Canada. Because of this, states have an open market to compete in which leads to a cutthroat competition. This paper will discuss the current regimes, how they work, and the benefits each has. The second half of this paper is a comparison of the most "successful" regime in Georgia to North Carolina. The conclusion focuses on how North Carolina can exploit weaknesses within the Georgia regime.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Film Tax Credits Across State Lines The Contestation of the Notion of Debt-Trap Diplomacy on Nigeria-China Relations: The Dilemma and Critical Issues Australian Federalism in James Buchanan's Early Work on Fiscal Equity Convergence across Subnational Regions of Bangladesh – What the Night Lights Data Say? The Effects of Local Government Financial Distress: Evidence from Toxic Loans
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1