会计准则可以理解吗?

Bryan Howieson, Janice Loftus, Sabine Schührer
{"title":"会计准则可以理解吗?","authors":"Bryan Howieson, Janice Loftus, Sabine Schührer","doi":"10.1111/acfi.13173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is concern that accounting standards are difficult to understand by those who use them. We investigate factors that enhance and inhibit the ability of the standards' users to comprehend their meaning and requirements. Readability statistics reveal that Australian accounting standards are difficult or very difficult to read. Interviews with experienced financial statement preparers and auditors from the for‐profit, not‐for‐profit private, and public sectors reveal that ‘understandability’ is a function of many inter‐related factors, only some of which relate to how standards are written and presented. We offer recommendations to standards‐setters about how the understandability of standards could be improved.","PeriodicalId":335953,"journal":{"name":"Accounting & Finance","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are accounting standards understandable?\",\"authors\":\"Bryan Howieson, Janice Loftus, Sabine Schührer\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/acfi.13173\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There is concern that accounting standards are difficult to understand by those who use them. We investigate factors that enhance and inhibit the ability of the standards' users to comprehend their meaning and requirements. Readability statistics reveal that Australian accounting standards are difficult or very difficult to read. Interviews with experienced financial statement preparers and auditors from the for‐profit, not‐for‐profit private, and public sectors reveal that ‘understandability’ is a function of many inter‐related factors, only some of which relate to how standards are written and presented. We offer recommendations to standards‐setters about how the understandability of standards could be improved.\",\"PeriodicalId\":335953,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounting & Finance\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounting & Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.13173\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting & Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.13173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有人担心,会计准则的使用者很难理解这些准则。我们研究了增强和抑制标准使用者理解其含义和要求的能力的因素。可读性统计数据显示,澳大利亚会计准则很难或非常难以阅读。对来自营利性、非营利性私营部门和公共部门的经验丰富的财务报表编制者和审计师的采访显示,“可理解性”是许多相互关联因素的函数,其中只有一些与标准的编写和呈现方式有关。我们就如何提高标准的可理解性向标准制定者提供建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Are accounting standards understandable?
There is concern that accounting standards are difficult to understand by those who use them. We investigate factors that enhance and inhibit the ability of the standards' users to comprehend their meaning and requirements. Readability statistics reveal that Australian accounting standards are difficult or very difficult to read. Interviews with experienced financial statement preparers and auditors from the for‐profit, not‐for‐profit private, and public sectors reveal that ‘understandability’ is a function of many inter‐related factors, only some of which relate to how standards are written and presented. We offer recommendations to standards‐setters about how the understandability of standards could be improved.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Keju tradition and major litigation cases: The persistent impact of Confucian norm standard The effect of government‐guided funds on target industries in development zones – Evidence from China Philanthropic forms of corporate social responsibility practices in a multinational company: Colonial and post‐colonial perspectives Rent‐seeking or value‐creating? The impact of managerial autonomy from state‐built corporate pyramids on M&A performance Government procurement and zombie firms' productivity: Evidence from China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1