自由贸易还是贸易?世界贸易组织、人权与发展(第二部分)

C. Lumina
{"title":"自由贸易还是贸易?世界贸易组织、人权与发展(第二部分)","authors":"C. Lumina","doi":"10.4314/LDD.V14I1.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author critically examines the role of the World Trade Organisation (WTO). In recent years, it is noted, the organisation’s agenda of trade liberalisation, its perceived lack of accountability and insensitivity to human rights have attracted intense criticism. It has been asserted that provisions of WTO agreements concerning agricultural trade and intellectual property directly affect the ability of governments to fulfil their human rights obligations. \n \nConversely, supporters of the WTO argue that by expanding global trade the organisation assists in raising living standards. While it is generally acknowledged that trade has an important role in improving livelihoods, studies indicate that trade liberalisation has not necessarily achieved this result for many WTO members. The author assesses these claims from a human rights perspective and explores the relationship between trade, human rights and development. The first part of the article, published in Volume 12(2), sketched the history and functions of the WTO, discusses the linkages between trade liberalisation, human rights and development, and assesses the human rights obligations of the WTO. It notes that most WTO Member States have assumed legal obligations through ratification of universal human rights treaties and concludes that the WTO’s trade liberalisation agenda should be more responsive to human rights. This part explores the human rights implications of two controversial WTO agreements: the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property and the Agreement on Agriculture.","PeriodicalId":341103,"journal":{"name":"Law, Democracy and Development","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Free trade or just trade? The world trade organisation, human rights and development (Part 2)\",\"authors\":\"C. Lumina\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/LDD.V14I1.9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The author critically examines the role of the World Trade Organisation (WTO). In recent years, it is noted, the organisation’s agenda of trade liberalisation, its perceived lack of accountability and insensitivity to human rights have attracted intense criticism. It has been asserted that provisions of WTO agreements concerning agricultural trade and intellectual property directly affect the ability of governments to fulfil their human rights obligations. \\n \\nConversely, supporters of the WTO argue that by expanding global trade the organisation assists in raising living standards. While it is generally acknowledged that trade has an important role in improving livelihoods, studies indicate that trade liberalisation has not necessarily achieved this result for many WTO members. The author assesses these claims from a human rights perspective and explores the relationship between trade, human rights and development. The first part of the article, published in Volume 12(2), sketched the history and functions of the WTO, discusses the linkages between trade liberalisation, human rights and development, and assesses the human rights obligations of the WTO. It notes that most WTO Member States have assumed legal obligations through ratification of universal human rights treaties and concludes that the WTO’s trade liberalisation agenda should be more responsive to human rights. This part explores the human rights implications of two controversial WTO agreements: the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property and the Agreement on Agriculture.\",\"PeriodicalId\":341103,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law, Democracy and Development\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law, Democracy and Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/LDD.V14I1.9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law, Democracy and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/LDD.V14I1.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

作者批判性地审视了世界贸易组织(WTO)的作用。有人指出,近年来,该组织的贸易自由化议程、被认为缺乏问责制以及对人权不敏感,招致了强烈批评。有人断言,世贸组织协定中有关农业贸易和知识产权的规定直接影响到政府履行其人权义务的能力。相反,世贸组织的支持者辩称,通过扩大全球贸易,该组织有助于提高生活水平。虽然人们普遍承认贸易在改善生计方面发挥着重要作用,但研究表明,贸易自由化对许多世贸组织成员来说并不一定能达到这一结果。作者从人权的角度对这些主张进行了评估,并探讨了贸易、人权和发展之间的关系。这篇文章的第一部分发表在第12卷(2)中,概述了世贸组织的历史和职能,讨论了贸易自由化、人权和发展之间的联系,并评估了世贸组织的人权义务。报告指出,大多数世贸组织成员国已通过批准普遍人权条约承担了法律义务,并得出结论认为,世贸组织的贸易自由化议程应更加顾及人权。这一部分探讨了两个有争议的WTO协议的人权含义:《与贸易有关的知识产权协议》和《农业协议》。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Free trade or just trade? The world trade organisation, human rights and development (Part 2)
The author critically examines the role of the World Trade Organisation (WTO). In recent years, it is noted, the organisation’s agenda of trade liberalisation, its perceived lack of accountability and insensitivity to human rights have attracted intense criticism. It has been asserted that provisions of WTO agreements concerning agricultural trade and intellectual property directly affect the ability of governments to fulfil their human rights obligations. Conversely, supporters of the WTO argue that by expanding global trade the organisation assists in raising living standards. While it is generally acknowledged that trade has an important role in improving livelihoods, studies indicate that trade liberalisation has not necessarily achieved this result for many WTO members. The author assesses these claims from a human rights perspective and explores the relationship between trade, human rights and development. The first part of the article, published in Volume 12(2), sketched the history and functions of the WTO, discusses the linkages between trade liberalisation, human rights and development, and assesses the human rights obligations of the WTO. It notes that most WTO Member States have assumed legal obligations through ratification of universal human rights treaties and concludes that the WTO’s trade liberalisation agenda should be more responsive to human rights. This part explores the human rights implications of two controversial WTO agreements: the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property and the Agreement on Agriculture.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A critique of the efficacy of the right to shelter for street children in Kenya A critical analysis of Massmart Holdings and Others v South African Commercial Catering and Allied Workers Union [2022] ZALCJHB 119 The rights of women in unregistered customary marriages in Zimbabwe: Best practices from South Africa Eliminating racial discrimination of employees: An assessment of the Employment Equity Act 55 of 1998, as amended A turning-point for transitional justice? Political violence in Zimbabwe, and transformative justice as a way forward
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1