巴基斯坦中学生英语写作中句法错误的比较分析

Azhari Ahmad, S. Shahid, Perveen Akhter Farhat
{"title":"巴基斯坦中学生英语写作中句法错误的比较分析","authors":"Azhari Ahmad, S. Shahid, Perveen Akhter Farhat","doi":"10.31703/glr.2023(viii-ii).18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this comparative study, the researchers analyzed the syntactical errors in English writings of secondary-level Pakistani ESL students; though syntactical errors are commonly found in each language, it is mostly committed by ESL students in English language writings. The present study was formed on the quantitative method. The population of the study was one government and one private secondary school in the district of Lahore. Due to ethical considerations, the schools' names were not mentioned. The researchers selected 60 students’ sample from both schools; the G-group 30 students represent government schools and P-group 30 students represent private schools; the questionnaire was divided among these students as a research instrument for data collection. The data was analyzed in statistical charts, and mentioned in numbers and percentages. The findings of this comparative study disclosed that private school students committed fewer syntactical errors than government school students justifying the role of medium of instruction.","PeriodicalId":365110,"journal":{"name":"Global Language Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of Syntactical Errors in the Writings of ESL Students at Secondary Level in Pakistan\",\"authors\":\"Azhari Ahmad, S. Shahid, Perveen Akhter Farhat\",\"doi\":\"10.31703/glr.2023(viii-ii).18\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this comparative study, the researchers analyzed the syntactical errors in English writings of secondary-level Pakistani ESL students; though syntactical errors are commonly found in each language, it is mostly committed by ESL students in English language writings. The present study was formed on the quantitative method. The population of the study was one government and one private secondary school in the district of Lahore. Due to ethical considerations, the schools' names were not mentioned. The researchers selected 60 students’ sample from both schools; the G-group 30 students represent government schools and P-group 30 students represent private schools; the questionnaire was divided among these students as a research instrument for data collection. The data was analyzed in statistical charts, and mentioned in numbers and percentages. The findings of this comparative study disclosed that private school students committed fewer syntactical errors than government school students justifying the role of medium of instruction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":365110,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Language Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Language Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31703/glr.2023(viii-ii).18\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Language Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31703/glr.2023(viii-ii).18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在本对比研究中,研究者分析了巴基斯坦二级ESL学生英语写作中的句法错误;虽然语法错误在每一种语言中都很常见,但它主要是由ESL学生在英语语言写作中犯的。本研究是在定量方法上形成的。研究对象为拉合尔地区的一所公立中学和一所私立中学。出于道德考虑,这些学校的名字没有被提及。研究人员从两所学校挑选了60名学生作为样本;g组30人代表公立学校,p组30人代表私立学校;问卷是作为收集数据的研究工具在这些学生中进行分配的。数据用统计图表进行分析,并以数字和百分比表示。本比较研究发现,私立学校学生的语法错误比公办学校学生少,这证明了教学媒介的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative Analysis of Syntactical Errors in the Writings of ESL Students at Secondary Level in Pakistan
In this comparative study, the researchers analyzed the syntactical errors in English writings of secondary-level Pakistani ESL students; though syntactical errors are commonly found in each language, it is mostly committed by ESL students in English language writings. The present study was formed on the quantitative method. The population of the study was one government and one private secondary school in the district of Lahore. Due to ethical considerations, the schools' names were not mentioned. The researchers selected 60 students’ sample from both schools; the G-group 30 students represent government schools and P-group 30 students represent private schools; the questionnaire was divided among these students as a research instrument for data collection. The data was analyzed in statistical charts, and mentioned in numbers and percentages. The findings of this comparative study disclosed that private school students committed fewer syntactical errors than government school students justifying the role of medium of instruction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Representing Gender Inequalities in the Curriculum of Punjab: A Content Analysis of Grade IX Textbook of English A Comparative Study of Vocabulary Assessment in Public and Private Sector Universities in Karachi, Pakistan Obstacles in English Learning: Perceptions of Science Major Undergraduates in Lahore Representation of Traumatization In Morrison's Beloved from A Caruthian Perspective An Investigation to Design Course of English for Legal Purposes (ELP) from Viewpoint of CBI in Sindh Law College, Hyderabad
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1