印度尼西亚和韩国少年司法制度的比较

Adelia Oktaviani, Satrio Fajar Romadhon, Muhammad Rusli Arafat
{"title":"印度尼西亚和韩国少年司法制度的比较","authors":"Adelia Oktaviani, Satrio Fajar Romadhon, Muhammad Rusli Arafat","doi":"10.51825/tjil.v2i1.17774","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Child growth is a period when children have a high level of curiosity, which sometimes leads them to commit crimes. According to the Indonesian Supreme Court Annual Report 2020, juvenile criminal cases reached 6,146. Meanwhile, as many as 38,590 cases of juvenile crimes were reported in the South Korean Judicial Yearbook 2020. There is a juvenile justice system to resolve juvenile criminal cases. This judicial system aims to educate and protect the rights of Children in Conflict with the Law for their future. The juvenile justice system in Indonesia is regulated in Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System (UU SPPA), while there is the Juvenile Act of 2015 that regulated juvenile cases in South Korea. A comparison of the juvenile justice system in the two countries in fostering and protecting juveniles is an interesting matter to discuss. This article includes statistics on juvenile cases, the juvenile justice system, types of punishment, and the laws that apply in both countries. By using normative legal research methods, the result of this article is to give a comparison of how Indonesia and South Korea solve juvenile cases based on their juvenile justice systems and regulations.","PeriodicalId":302271,"journal":{"name":"Tirtayasa Journal of International Law","volume":"424 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COMPARISON OF JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEMS IN INDONESIA AND SOUTH KOREA\",\"authors\":\"Adelia Oktaviani, Satrio Fajar Romadhon, Muhammad Rusli Arafat\",\"doi\":\"10.51825/tjil.v2i1.17774\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": Child growth is a period when children have a high level of curiosity, which sometimes leads them to commit crimes. According to the Indonesian Supreme Court Annual Report 2020, juvenile criminal cases reached 6,146. Meanwhile, as many as 38,590 cases of juvenile crimes were reported in the South Korean Judicial Yearbook 2020. There is a juvenile justice system to resolve juvenile criminal cases. This judicial system aims to educate and protect the rights of Children in Conflict with the Law for their future. The juvenile justice system in Indonesia is regulated in Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System (UU SPPA), while there is the Juvenile Act of 2015 that regulated juvenile cases in South Korea. A comparison of the juvenile justice system in the two countries in fostering and protecting juveniles is an interesting matter to discuss. This article includes statistics on juvenile cases, the juvenile justice system, types of punishment, and the laws that apply in both countries. By using normative legal research methods, the result of this article is to give a comparison of how Indonesia and South Korea solve juvenile cases based on their juvenile justice systems and regulations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":302271,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tirtayasa Journal of International Law\",\"volume\":\"424 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tirtayasa Journal of International Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51825/tjil.v2i1.17774\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tirtayasa Journal of International Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51825/tjil.v2i1.17774","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当前位置儿童成长时期是孩子们具有高度好奇心的时期,这种好奇心有时会导致他们犯罪。根据印尼最高法院2020年年度报告,青少年刑事案件达到6146起。与此同时,在《韩国司法年鉴2020》中,青少年犯罪案件多达3.8590万件。有一个少年司法制度来解决少年刑事案件。这一司法制度旨在教育和保护触犯法律的儿童的权利,为他们的未来着想。印度尼西亚的少年司法制度由2012年第11号法律规定,该法律涉及少年刑事司法制度(UU SPPA),而韩国则有2015年的《少年法》规定少年案件。比较两国在培养和保护青少年方面的少年司法制度是一个值得讨论的有趣问题。这篇文章包括青少年案件的统计数据,青少年司法系统,惩罚类型,以及适用于两国的法律。本文运用规范的法律研究方法,对印尼和韩国在少年司法制度和法规的基础上如何解决少年案件进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COMPARISON OF JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEMS IN INDONESIA AND SOUTH KOREA
: Child growth is a period when children have a high level of curiosity, which sometimes leads them to commit crimes. According to the Indonesian Supreme Court Annual Report 2020, juvenile criminal cases reached 6,146. Meanwhile, as many as 38,590 cases of juvenile crimes were reported in the South Korean Judicial Yearbook 2020. There is a juvenile justice system to resolve juvenile criminal cases. This judicial system aims to educate and protect the rights of Children in Conflict with the Law for their future. The juvenile justice system in Indonesia is regulated in Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System (UU SPPA), while there is the Juvenile Act of 2015 that regulated juvenile cases in South Korea. A comparison of the juvenile justice system in the two countries in fostering and protecting juveniles is an interesting matter to discuss. This article includes statistics on juvenile cases, the juvenile justice system, types of punishment, and the laws that apply in both countries. By using normative legal research methods, the result of this article is to give a comparison of how Indonesia and South Korea solve juvenile cases based on their juvenile justice systems and regulations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Urgency of the Newest Renewable Energy Law in International Law Perspective Penyelesaian Konflik Rusia-Ukraina Dalam Perspektif Hukum Internasional An Introductory of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade and Their Dispute Settlement System Defense and Technical Cooperation Between Indonesia and Russia for the Defense and Security (2010-2015) Urgency of Silky Shark Protection In Bangka Belitung Province Based on International And National Law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1