摘要与结论:版权与欧洲法院:角色、行动、遗产

Eleonora Rosati
{"title":"摘要与结论:版权与欧洲法院:角色、行动、遗产","authors":"Eleonora Rosati","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780198837176.003.0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The role of the CJEU in shaping the EU copyright framework has been of paramount importance. Further to a fragmentary approach to copyright harmonization and a resulting legislative framework whose provisions have proved to be rather inscrutable or altogether challenging to interpret, also in light of the issues arising out of technological advancement and new modalities of exploitation and infringement of copyright works and other protected subject matter, national courts have increasingly relied on the instrument of references for a preliminary ruling. As of today, in the context of the relatively brief history of EU copyright and within a timeframe of less than twenty years, the CJEU has issued several key preliminary rulings....","PeriodicalId":313855,"journal":{"name":"Copyright and the Court of Justice of the European Union","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Summary and Conclusion—Copyright and the CJEU: Role, Action, Legacy\",\"authors\":\"Eleonora Rosati\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/OSO/9780198837176.003.0010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The role of the CJEU in shaping the EU copyright framework has been of paramount importance. Further to a fragmentary approach to copyright harmonization and a resulting legislative framework whose provisions have proved to be rather inscrutable or altogether challenging to interpret, also in light of the issues arising out of technological advancement and new modalities of exploitation and infringement of copyright works and other protected subject matter, national courts have increasingly relied on the instrument of references for a preliminary ruling. As of today, in the context of the relatively brief history of EU copyright and within a timeframe of less than twenty years, the CJEU has issued several key preliminary rulings....\",\"PeriodicalId\":313855,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Copyright and the Court of Justice of the European Union\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Copyright and the Court of Justice of the European Union\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780198837176.003.0010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Copyright and the Court of Justice of the European Union","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780198837176.003.0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

欧洲法院在塑造欧盟版权框架方面的作用至关重要。除了对版权协调采取不完整的方法和由此产生的立法框架,其条款已被证明相当难以理解或完全难以解释之外,也考虑到技术进步和利用和侵犯版权作品和其他受保护主题的新模式所产生的问题,国家法院越来越多地依赖参考文书进行初步裁决。截至今天,在欧盟版权相对较短的历史背景下,在不到20年的时间框架内,欧洲法院发布了几项关键的初步裁决....
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Summary and Conclusion—Copyright and the CJEU: Role, Action, Legacy
The role of the CJEU in shaping the EU copyright framework has been of paramount importance. Further to a fragmentary approach to copyright harmonization and a resulting legislative framework whose provisions have proved to be rather inscrutable or altogether challenging to interpret, also in light of the issues arising out of technological advancement and new modalities of exploitation and infringement of copyright works and other protected subject matter, national courts have increasingly relied on the instrument of references for a preliminary ruling. As of today, in the context of the relatively brief history of EU copyright and within a timeframe of less than twenty years, the CJEU has issued several key preliminary rulings....
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CJEU Case Law and the Interplay with Policy and Legislative Action in the DSM Relevance of EU Copyright Law to (Future) Non-EU Member States Enforcement of Copyright The Construction of Exceptions and Limitations in the InfoSoc Directive The Construction of Economic Rights in the InfoSoc Directive
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1