超越智能专业化——区域创新政策的一些新见解

Emmanuel Muller
{"title":"超越智能专业化——区域创新政策的一些新见解","authors":"Emmanuel Muller","doi":"10.5771/9783748907770-303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Regions are attributed an important role in innovation policy and since at least the launch of the current Structural Funds period, European regions face the challenge to conceive Research and Innovation Strategies for Smart Specialisation (RIS3). Departing from this new innovation policy paradigm and the policy role, this paper addresses specific challenges for regional innovation policy making, aiming at delivering indications for supporting those policy processes. It addresses questions like: How can innovation policy on the regional level define its position in the new strategy-building context? Which factors may be decisive to contribute to efficient policy-making? How can policy making be supported by new concepts and approaches in innovation research? We can speak here of novel approaches in innovation policy and adapt findings from innovation research, especially when it comes to the issue of creativity. Following Sternberg, creative achievements need to fulfil the requirements of novelty and relevance to be successfully implemented.2 Héraud/Muller add a further aspect: willingness, understood as “willingness to change the world”, in our context as capacity and motivation to enforce participative processes, to take risks for selecting and standing for (defending) selected specialisations, but also of observing and assessing their development and deciding about their development.3 I.","PeriodicalId":151531,"journal":{"name":"Innovative Verwaltung in Forschung und Lehre","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Going Beyond Smart Specialisation ‒ Some New Insights for Regional Innovation Policies\",\"authors\":\"Emmanuel Muller\",\"doi\":\"10.5771/9783748907770-303\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Regions are attributed an important role in innovation policy and since at least the launch of the current Structural Funds period, European regions face the challenge to conceive Research and Innovation Strategies for Smart Specialisation (RIS3). Departing from this new innovation policy paradigm and the policy role, this paper addresses specific challenges for regional innovation policy making, aiming at delivering indications for supporting those policy processes. It addresses questions like: How can innovation policy on the regional level define its position in the new strategy-building context? Which factors may be decisive to contribute to efficient policy-making? How can policy making be supported by new concepts and approaches in innovation research? We can speak here of novel approaches in innovation policy and adapt findings from innovation research, especially when it comes to the issue of creativity. Following Sternberg, creative achievements need to fulfil the requirements of novelty and relevance to be successfully implemented.2 Héraud/Muller add a further aspect: willingness, understood as “willingness to change the world”, in our context as capacity and motivation to enforce participative processes, to take risks for selecting and standing for (defending) selected specialisations, but also of observing and assessing their development and deciding about their development.3 I.\",\"PeriodicalId\":151531,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Innovative Verwaltung in Forschung und Lehre\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Innovative Verwaltung in Forschung und Lehre\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748907770-303\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovative Verwaltung in Forschung und Lehre","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748907770-303","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

各地区在创新政策中发挥着重要作用,至少自当前结构性基金启动以来,欧洲各地区面临着构想智能专业化研究和创新战略(RIS3)的挑战。本文从这一新的创新政策范式和政策角色出发,探讨了区域创新政策制定的具体挑战,旨在为支持这些政策过程提供指示。它解决了以下问题:区域层面的创新政策如何在新的战略制定背景下确定其地位?哪些因素可能对有效的政策制定起决定性作用?创新研究中的新概念和新方法如何支持政策制定?在这里,我们可以谈论创新政策的新方法,并适应创新研究的结果,特别是当涉及到创造力问题时。继斯滕伯格之后,创造性成就需要满足新颖性和相关性的要求才能成功实施hsamraud /Muller补充了一个进一步的方面:意愿,理解为“改变世界的意愿”,在我们的语境中是执行参与过程的能力和动机,为选择和捍卫所选择的专业承担风险,但也观察和评估他们的发展并决定他们的发展我。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Going Beyond Smart Specialisation ‒ Some New Insights for Regional Innovation Policies
Regions are attributed an important role in innovation policy and since at least the launch of the current Structural Funds period, European regions face the challenge to conceive Research and Innovation Strategies for Smart Specialisation (RIS3). Departing from this new innovation policy paradigm and the policy role, this paper addresses specific challenges for regional innovation policy making, aiming at delivering indications for supporting those policy processes. It addresses questions like: How can innovation policy on the regional level define its position in the new strategy-building context? Which factors may be decisive to contribute to efficient policy-making? How can policy making be supported by new concepts and approaches in innovation research? We can speak here of novel approaches in innovation policy and adapt findings from innovation research, especially when it comes to the issue of creativity. Following Sternberg, creative achievements need to fulfil the requirements of novelty and relevance to be successfully implemented.2 Héraud/Muller add a further aspect: willingness, understood as “willingness to change the world”, in our context as capacity and motivation to enforce participative processes, to take risks for selecting and standing for (defending) selected specialisations, but also of observing and assessing their development and deciding about their development.3 I.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Warum ein generalistisches Studium interdisziplinäre Lehre erfordert – Thesen zur Stärkung der interdisziplinären Lehre an den Hochschulen für den öffentlichen Dienst Sozialdatenschutz und Rechnungsprüfung Flüssigboden – eine (neue) Herausforderung für das Bodenschutzrecht? Voraussetzungen zur Gründung eines Eigenbetriebs „Bitte kein BID!” – Zum vorläufigen Scheitern eines städtebaulichen Erfolgsmodells in Baden-Württemberg
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1