分布式文档审查的缺陷和dr的补救措施(文档树管理工具)与分布式审查的支持

T. V. Krishnamurthy, Sapna Subramani
{"title":"分布式文档审查的缺陷和dr的补救措施(文档树管理工具)与分布式审查的支持","authors":"T. V. Krishnamurthy, Sapna Subramani","doi":"10.1109/ICGSE.2008.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In distributed software development, effective reviews of analysis documents lead to increased correctness of analysis results. When managed without tool support, such reviews lead to ineffective usage of time and effort and possibly even delay the project. Also going ahead without reviews completed, implies risks of incorrect or incomplete features. In this paper we contrast the manual process we used to follow to organize distributed software reviews and the process with DOCTOR to show how it greatly improves the process of distributed software reviews. We also attempt to provide a projection in terms of cost of efforts saved and the resultant increase in productivity. We also compare DOCTOR with other Web-based tools and project its advantages and disadvantages. We hope to convince readers who haven't adopted tool based support for distributed reviews by this paper on the clear advantages of the same.","PeriodicalId":340054,"journal":{"name":"2008 IEEE International Conference on Global Software Engineering","volume":"148 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ailments of Distributed Document Reviews and Remedies of DOCTOR (DOCument Tree ORganizer Tool) with Distributed Reviews Support\",\"authors\":\"T. V. Krishnamurthy, Sapna Subramani\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICGSE.2008.8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In distributed software development, effective reviews of analysis documents lead to increased correctness of analysis results. When managed without tool support, such reviews lead to ineffective usage of time and effort and possibly even delay the project. Also going ahead without reviews completed, implies risks of incorrect or incomplete features. In this paper we contrast the manual process we used to follow to organize distributed software reviews and the process with DOCTOR to show how it greatly improves the process of distributed software reviews. We also attempt to provide a projection in terms of cost of efforts saved and the resultant increase in productivity. We also compare DOCTOR with other Web-based tools and project its advantages and disadvantages. We hope to convince readers who haven't adopted tool based support for distributed reviews by this paper on the clear advantages of the same.\",\"PeriodicalId\":340054,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2008 IEEE International Conference on Global Software Engineering\",\"volume\":\"148 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2008 IEEE International Conference on Global Software Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICGSE.2008.8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 IEEE International Conference on Global Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICGSE.2008.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

在分布式软件开发中,对分析文档的有效评审可以提高分析结果的正确性。在没有工具支持的情况下进行管理时,这样的审查会导致时间和精力的无效使用,甚至可能延迟项目。此外,在没有完成审查的情况下继续进行,意味着存在功能不正确或不完整的风险。在本文中,我们对比了我们过去用来组织分布式软件评审的手工过程和带有DOCTOR的过程,以显示它如何极大地改进了分布式软件评审的过程。我们还试图根据节省的工作成本和由此产生的生产力提高提供一个预测。我们还将DOCTOR与其他基于web的工具进行了比较,并预测了其优缺点。我们希望能够说服那些还没有采用基于工具的分布式评审支持的读者,让他们明白本文的优点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ailments of Distributed Document Reviews and Remedies of DOCTOR (DOCument Tree ORganizer Tool) with Distributed Reviews Support
In distributed software development, effective reviews of analysis documents lead to increased correctness of analysis results. When managed without tool support, such reviews lead to ineffective usage of time and effort and possibly even delay the project. Also going ahead without reviews completed, implies risks of incorrect or incomplete features. In this paper we contrast the manual process we used to follow to organize distributed software reviews and the process with DOCTOR to show how it greatly improves the process of distributed software reviews. We also attempt to provide a projection in terms of cost of efforts saved and the resultant increase in productivity. We also compare DOCTOR with other Web-based tools and project its advantages and disadvantages. We hope to convince readers who haven't adopted tool based support for distributed reviews by this paper on the clear advantages of the same.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Experiences of Instant Messaging in Global Software Development Projects: A Multiple Case Study Having a Foot on Each Shore - Bridging Global Software Development in the Case of SMEs Developing an Inter-site Coordination Index for Global Software Development Adopting Agile in Distributed Development On the Suitability of Particular Software Development Roles to Global Software Development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1