背景因素与开放式创新:是否存在矛盾或研究较少的命题?

V. Lazzarotti, R. Manzini, L. Pellegrini
{"title":"背景因素与开放式创新:是否存在矛盾或研究较少的命题?","authors":"V. Lazzarotti, R. Manzini, L. Pellegrini","doi":"10.1504/IJIRD.2011.042187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Open Innovation (OI) is emerging as a new alternative in opposition to the closed approach: its key tenet is that not all good ideas emerge within organisations and not all good internal ideas can be successfully commercialised by the same firm. \n \nIn the last years, even with an attention to OI, most researches have focused on theoretical considerations and case studies, while large-scale studies are still limited. Despite the depth of analysis of case studies is undisputed, surveys have greater hope of extending results. Moreover, although some relationships between contextual factors, OI and performance have been analysed through surveys, they remain quite contradictory. \n \nTherefore, the aim of this article is to point out these relationships, whether they are contradictory or little investigated by surveys, in order to encourage future empirical research. Consistently, the design of authors’ survey project is presented.","PeriodicalId":260303,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contextual factors and open innovation: are there contradictory or yet little investigated propositions?\",\"authors\":\"V. Lazzarotti, R. Manzini, L. Pellegrini\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/IJIRD.2011.042187\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Open Innovation (OI) is emerging as a new alternative in opposition to the closed approach: its key tenet is that not all good ideas emerge within organisations and not all good internal ideas can be successfully commercialised by the same firm. \\n \\nIn the last years, even with an attention to OI, most researches have focused on theoretical considerations and case studies, while large-scale studies are still limited. Despite the depth of analysis of case studies is undisputed, surveys have greater hope of extending results. Moreover, although some relationships between contextual factors, OI and performance have been analysed through surveys, they remain quite contradictory. \\n \\nTherefore, the aim of this article is to point out these relationships, whether they are contradictory or little investigated by surveys, in order to encourage future empirical research. Consistently, the design of authors’ survey project is presented.\",\"PeriodicalId\":260303,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIRD.2011.042187\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIRD.2011.042187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

开放式创新(Open Innovation, OI)正作为一种新的替代方案出现,以对抗封闭的方法:其关键原则是,不是所有好的想法都来自组织内部,也不是所有好的内部想法都能被同一家公司成功商业化。近年来,尽管对成骨不全的研究有所关注,但大多数研究都集中在理论考虑和案例研究上,大规模的研究仍然有限。尽管案例研究的深度分析是无可争议的,但调查更有希望扩大结果。此外,尽管通过调查分析了环境因素、成骨不全度和绩效之间的一些关系,但它们仍然相当矛盾。因此,本文的目的是指出这些关系,无论它们是矛盾的还是调查调查的少,以鼓励未来的实证研究。同时,提出了作者的调查方案设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Contextual factors and open innovation: are there contradictory or yet little investigated propositions?
Open Innovation (OI) is emerging as a new alternative in opposition to the closed approach: its key tenet is that not all good ideas emerge within organisations and not all good internal ideas can be successfully commercialised by the same firm. In the last years, even with an attention to OI, most researches have focused on theoretical considerations and case studies, while large-scale studies are still limited. Despite the depth of analysis of case studies is undisputed, surveys have greater hope of extending results. Moreover, although some relationships between contextual factors, OI and performance have been analysed through surveys, they remain quite contradictory. Therefore, the aim of this article is to point out these relationships, whether they are contradictory or little investigated by surveys, in order to encourage future empirical research. Consistently, the design of authors’ survey project is presented.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Social capital, regional development and innovation in Greece: an interregional analysis Investigation of regional development in Brazil: a patento-scientometric approach Innovative regional development through triple helix collaboration: a comparative case study of strategic structures and implementation Characterisation and assessment of the technological innovation network of the Valparaíso Region in Chile Social entrepreneurship and charismatic leadership: Master Cheng Yen and Tzu Chi Foundation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1