C. Natalia, C. Oktavia, W. Makatita, Ferdian Suprata
{"title":"Integrasi模型屋的风险和分析网络过程(anp),以减轻风险供应链","authors":"C. Natalia, C. Oktavia, W. Makatita, Ferdian Suprata","doi":"10.25170/METRIS.V22I01.2619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Currently, the resilience of the company is not separated from the strength supply chain network. Without this network, so the business process will not run well. But the strong supply chain network became vulnerable to risk. It caused by complexity and a highly dependent supply chain network. These risks need to minimize. The method that can be used to minimize risk with integrating the house of risk method and Analytical Network Process. The purpose of these integration methods to identification and recognized interrelationships between risk agent’s mitigation strategies, so the effect of event risk can be reduced. And then, by looking strategies can reducing costs incurred by the company and efficiency of risk agent’s mitigation strategy. Based on the results of House of Risk stage 1, there are 25 causes of risk that need to mitigate. The risk mitigation strategies that obtained to minimize the causes of risk, are then processed by the Analytical Networking Process (ANP) method. Based on the results of the Analytical Networking Process (ANP) method, there are two risk mitigation strategies. House of Risk stage 2 has applied to measure the efficiency and the level of difficulty of these two risk mitigation strategies. The results showed that the best mitigation strategies are conducting training and measuring company’s performance.","PeriodicalId":402087,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal METRIS","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"INTEGRASI MODEL HOUSE OF RISK DAN ANALYTICAL NETWORKING PROCESS (ANP) UNTUK MITIGASI RISIKO SUPPLY CHAIN\",\"authors\":\"C. Natalia, C. Oktavia, W. Makatita, Ferdian Suprata\",\"doi\":\"10.25170/METRIS.V22I01.2619\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Currently, the resilience of the company is not separated from the strength supply chain network. Without this network, so the business process will not run well. But the strong supply chain network became vulnerable to risk. It caused by complexity and a highly dependent supply chain network. These risks need to minimize. The method that can be used to minimize risk with integrating the house of risk method and Analytical Network Process. The purpose of these integration methods to identification and recognized interrelationships between risk agent’s mitigation strategies, so the effect of event risk can be reduced. And then, by looking strategies can reducing costs incurred by the company and efficiency of risk agent’s mitigation strategy. Based on the results of House of Risk stage 1, there are 25 causes of risk that need to mitigate. The risk mitigation strategies that obtained to minimize the causes of risk, are then processed by the Analytical Networking Process (ANP) method. Based on the results of the Analytical Networking Process (ANP) method, there are two risk mitigation strategies. House of Risk stage 2 has applied to measure the efficiency and the level of difficulty of these two risk mitigation strategies. The results showed that the best mitigation strategies are conducting training and measuring company’s performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":402087,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal METRIS\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal METRIS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25170/METRIS.V22I01.2619\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal METRIS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25170/METRIS.V22I01.2619","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
目前,公司的弹性还没有脱离供应链网络的实力。如果没有这个网络,那么业务流程将不能很好地运行。但是,强大的供应链网络变得容易受到风险的影响。这是由复杂性和高度依赖的供应链网络造成的。这些风险需要最小化。将风险屋法与分析网络过程相结合,实现风险最小化的方法。这些集成方法的目的是识别和识别风险主体的缓解策略之间的相互关系,从而降低事件风险的影响。然后,通过寻找策略可以降低公司的成本和风险代理人的缓解策略的效率。基于House of Risk阶段1的结果,有25个风险原因需要减轻。然后,通过分析网络过程(ANP)方法处理为最小化风险原因而获得的风险缓解策略。基于分析网络过程(ANP)方法的结果,有两种风险缓解策略。风险之家阶段2用于衡量这两种风险缓解策略的效率和难度。结果表明,最好的缓解策略是开展培训和衡量公司绩效。
INTEGRASI MODEL HOUSE OF RISK DAN ANALYTICAL NETWORKING PROCESS (ANP) UNTUK MITIGASI RISIKO SUPPLY CHAIN
Currently, the resilience of the company is not separated from the strength supply chain network. Without this network, so the business process will not run well. But the strong supply chain network became vulnerable to risk. It caused by complexity and a highly dependent supply chain network. These risks need to minimize. The method that can be used to minimize risk with integrating the house of risk method and Analytical Network Process. The purpose of these integration methods to identification and recognized interrelationships between risk agent’s mitigation strategies, so the effect of event risk can be reduced. And then, by looking strategies can reducing costs incurred by the company and efficiency of risk agent’s mitigation strategy. Based on the results of House of Risk stage 1, there are 25 causes of risk that need to mitigate. The risk mitigation strategies that obtained to minimize the causes of risk, are then processed by the Analytical Networking Process (ANP) method. Based on the results of the Analytical Networking Process (ANP) method, there are two risk mitigation strategies. House of Risk stage 2 has applied to measure the efficiency and the level of difficulty of these two risk mitigation strategies. The results showed that the best mitigation strategies are conducting training and measuring company’s performance.