基于层次分析法的交互式自适应系统评价方法选择研究

Amira Dhouib, Abdelwaheb Trabelsi, C. Kolski, M. Neji
{"title":"基于层次分析法的交互式自适应系统评价方法选择研究","authors":"Amira Dhouib, Abdelwaheb Trabelsi, C. Kolski, M. Neji","doi":"10.1109/RCIS.2016.7549289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The evaluation of interactive adaptive systems is the source of many difficulties for novice evaluators as well as for expert ones. Issues arise in the need to identify the appropriate evaluation methods to be used for a given evaluation context. This paper proposes an approach for the choice of evaluation methods for interactive adaptive systems with regard to their suitability depending on specific evaluation contexts. A multicriteria decision making approach, namely the Analytic Hierarchy Process, is proposed for the selection methodology. The approach is based on a pair-wise comparison of a number of criteria that affect the choice of the appropriate evaluation methods. Four user-centred evaluation methods in conjunction with the layered evaluation for interactive adaptive systems are presented in the cases studies. These methods are: user-as-wizard, heuristic evaluation, focus group, and user test. The proposed approach is flexible in the sense that it can be used in the case of different evaluation methods. The results depend on the evaluation context where the methods will be used. Hence, we illustrate the proposed approach in the case of two evaluation contexts.","PeriodicalId":344289,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE Tenth International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An approach for the selection of evaluation methods for interactive adaptive systems using analytic hierarchy process\",\"authors\":\"Amira Dhouib, Abdelwaheb Trabelsi, C. Kolski, M. Neji\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RCIS.2016.7549289\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The evaluation of interactive adaptive systems is the source of many difficulties for novice evaluators as well as for expert ones. Issues arise in the need to identify the appropriate evaluation methods to be used for a given evaluation context. This paper proposes an approach for the choice of evaluation methods for interactive adaptive systems with regard to their suitability depending on specific evaluation contexts. A multicriteria decision making approach, namely the Analytic Hierarchy Process, is proposed for the selection methodology. The approach is based on a pair-wise comparison of a number of criteria that affect the choice of the appropriate evaluation methods. Four user-centred evaluation methods in conjunction with the layered evaluation for interactive adaptive systems are presented in the cases studies. These methods are: user-as-wizard, heuristic evaluation, focus group, and user test. The proposed approach is flexible in the sense that it can be used in the case of different evaluation methods. The results depend on the evaluation context where the methods will be used. Hence, we illustrate the proposed approach in the case of two evaluation contexts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":344289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 IEEE Tenth International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 IEEE Tenth International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/RCIS.2016.7549289\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE Tenth International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RCIS.2016.7549289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

对交互式自适应系统的评价是新手和专家的许多困难的来源。需要为给定的评价环境确定适当的评价方法,这就产生了问题。本文提出了一种交互式自适应系统评估方法的选择方法,根据具体的评估环境来考虑其适用性。提出了一种多标准决策方法,即层次分析法,用于选择方法。该方法基于对影响选择适当评估方法的若干标准的成对比较。在案例研究中提出了四种以用户为中心的评价方法,并结合交互式自适应系统的分层评价。这些方法是:用户即向导、启发式评估、焦点小组和用户测试。所建议的方法是灵活的,因为它可以在不同的评价方法的情况下使用。结果取决于将使用方法的评估上下文。因此,我们在两个评估上下文的情况下说明了所建议的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An approach for the selection of evaluation methods for interactive adaptive systems using analytic hierarchy process
The evaluation of interactive adaptive systems is the source of many difficulties for novice evaluators as well as for expert ones. Issues arise in the need to identify the appropriate evaluation methods to be used for a given evaluation context. This paper proposes an approach for the choice of evaluation methods for interactive adaptive systems with regard to their suitability depending on specific evaluation contexts. A multicriteria decision making approach, namely the Analytic Hierarchy Process, is proposed for the selection methodology. The approach is based on a pair-wise comparison of a number of criteria that affect the choice of the appropriate evaluation methods. Four user-centred evaluation methods in conjunction with the layered evaluation for interactive adaptive systems are presented in the cases studies. These methods are: user-as-wizard, heuristic evaluation, focus group, and user test. The proposed approach is flexible in the sense that it can be used in the case of different evaluation methods. The results depend on the evaluation context where the methods will be used. Hence, we illustrate the proposed approach in the case of two evaluation contexts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A fuzzy extension of SPARQL for querying gradual RDF data Incorporating privacy patterns into semi-automatic business process derivation Conceptual schema of miRNA's expression: Using efficient information systems practices to manage and analyse data about miRNA expression studies in breast cancer A generic architecture for spatial crowdsourcing Increasing secondary diagnosis encoding quality using data mining techniques
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1