客座编辑介绍:亚洲还剩下什么

Hairong Yan, Daniel Vukovich
{"title":"客座编辑介绍:亚洲还剩下什么","authors":"Hairong Yan, Daniel Vukovich","doi":"10.1215/10679847-2006-029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction to a special issue of \"Positions: East Asia Cultures Critique\" on the question of \"What's Left of Asia?\" This essay, co-authored with Yan Hairong, surveys the collected articles within the context of extant work on the meaning and history of the concept of \"Asia\" within area studies and inter-Asian cultural studies. It also grounds such academic work in the context of past imperial/colonial histories of Asia and within the current globalization of capitalism in the region. \"Asia\" remains an inherently problematic concept-metaphor for a radically diverse, discontinuous, and conflicted \"area\" but also remains a term we have to keep using and hopefully re-inventing to meet contemporary intellectual and political needs.","PeriodicalId":131234,"journal":{"name":"Positions-east Asia Cultures Critique","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Guest Editors's Introduction: What's Left of Asia\",\"authors\":\"Hairong Yan, Daniel Vukovich\",\"doi\":\"10.1215/10679847-2006-029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction to a special issue of \\\"Positions: East Asia Cultures Critique\\\" on the question of \\\"What's Left of Asia?\\\" This essay, co-authored with Yan Hairong, surveys the collected articles within the context of extant work on the meaning and history of the concept of \\\"Asia\\\" within area studies and inter-Asian cultural studies. It also grounds such academic work in the context of past imperial/colonial histories of Asia and within the current globalization of capitalism in the region. \\\"Asia\\\" remains an inherently problematic concept-metaphor for a radically diverse, discontinuous, and conflicted \\\"area\\\" but also remains a term we have to keep using and hopefully re-inventing to meet contemporary intellectual and political needs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":131234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Positions-east Asia Cultures Critique\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Positions-east Asia Cultures Critique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1215/10679847-2006-029\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Positions-east Asia Cultures Critique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/10679847-2006-029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

《立场:东亚文化批判》关于“亚洲还剩下什么?”问题的特刊导言本文与闫海荣合著,在区域研究和跨亚洲文化研究中“亚洲”概念的意义和历史的现有工作背景下,对所收集的文章进行了调查。它还在亚洲过去的帝国/殖民历史和当前该地区资本主义全球化的背景下建立了这样的学术工作。“亚洲”仍然是一个本质上有问题的概念——一个极端多样化、不连续和冲突的“地区”的隐喻,但也仍然是一个我们必须不断使用并希望重新创造以满足当代智力和政治需求的术语。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Guest Editors's Introduction: What's Left of Asia
Introduction to a special issue of "Positions: East Asia Cultures Critique" on the question of "What's Left of Asia?" This essay, co-authored with Yan Hairong, surveys the collected articles within the context of extant work on the meaning and history of the concept of "Asia" within area studies and inter-Asian cultural studies. It also grounds such academic work in the context of past imperial/colonial histories of Asia and within the current globalization of capitalism in the region. "Asia" remains an inherently problematic concept-metaphor for a radically diverse, discontinuous, and conflicted "area" but also remains a term we have to keep using and hopefully re-inventing to meet contemporary intellectual and political needs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
In the Beginning: Blackness and the 1960s Creative Nonfiction of Ōe Kenzaburō The Return of the Repressed: Uncanny Spaces of Nostalgia and Loss in Trần Anh Hùng's Cyclo Genealogies of NGO-ness: The Cultural Politics of a Global Buddhist Movement in Contemporary Taiwan Fractured Identities and Refracted Images: The Neither/Nor of National Imagination in Contemporary Taiwan Engendering Victimhood: Women in Literature of Atrocity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1