理性化、探索性、理解性:制度采用领域的演变

S. Ramanathan, J. Rose
{"title":"理性化、探索性、理解性:制度采用领域的演变","authors":"S. Ramanathan, J. Rose","doi":"10.1109/HICSS.2003.1174732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Previous surveys of the interorganizational systems (IOS) adoption field have developed taxonomic schemes to improve general understanding of the field. This paper instead studies the historical development of the field and describes its evolution in a stage model. In the rationalizing stage researchers tried to discover and communicate reasons for some apparently successful adoptions of IOS. However it soon became clear that IOS adoption was relatively limited and in the probing stage the focus changed to investigating the failure of the promised seamless integration. No unified coherent theoretical account emerged from these studies, so in the understanding stage researchers widened the focus of study to try to develop a richer account of the many complex influences on IOS adoption. The three stages are associated with different objectives, assumptions, theoretical backgrounds and research approaches.","PeriodicalId":159242,"journal":{"name":"36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rationalizing, probing, understanding: the evolution of the systems adoption field\",\"authors\":\"S. Ramanathan, J. Rose\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/HICSS.2003.1174732\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Previous surveys of the interorganizational systems (IOS) adoption field have developed taxonomic schemes to improve general understanding of the field. This paper instead studies the historical development of the field and describes its evolution in a stage model. In the rationalizing stage researchers tried to discover and communicate reasons for some apparently successful adoptions of IOS. However it soon became clear that IOS adoption was relatively limited and in the probing stage the focus changed to investigating the failure of the promised seamless integration. No unified coherent theoretical account emerged from these studies, so in the understanding stage researchers widened the focus of study to try to develop a richer account of the many complex influences on IOS adoption. The three stages are associated with different objectives, assumptions, theoretical backgrounds and research approaches.\",\"PeriodicalId\":159242,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2003.1174732\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2003.1174732","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

以前对组织间系统(IOS)采用领域的调查已经制定了分类方案,以提高对该领域的一般理解。相反,本文研究了该领域的历史发展,并以阶段模型描述了其演变。在合理化阶段,研究人员试图发现并传达一些明显成功采用IOS的原因。然而,很快我们就发现IOS的采用相对有限,在探索阶段,我们的重点转向了调查承诺的无缝整合的失败。这些研究没有形成统一连贯的理论解释,因此在理解阶段,研究人员扩大了研究的重点,试图对IOS采用的许多复杂影响进行更丰富的解释。这三个阶段具有不同的目标、假设、理论背景和研究方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Rationalizing, probing, understanding: the evolution of the systems adoption field
Previous surveys of the interorganizational systems (IOS) adoption field have developed taxonomic schemes to improve general understanding of the field. This paper instead studies the historical development of the field and describes its evolution in a stage model. In the rationalizing stage researchers tried to discover and communicate reasons for some apparently successful adoptions of IOS. However it soon became clear that IOS adoption was relatively limited and in the probing stage the focus changed to investigating the failure of the promised seamless integration. No unified coherent theoretical account emerged from these studies, so in the understanding stage researchers widened the focus of study to try to develop a richer account of the many complex influences on IOS adoption. The three stages are associated with different objectives, assumptions, theoretical backgrounds and research approaches.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
No more shadow boxing with online music piracy: strategic business models to enhance revenues Balancing safety against performance: tradeoffs in Internet security The transitional role of institutional trust in online interorganizational relationships The development and proliferation of consensus security configuration benchmarks for systems connected to the Internet Multi-criteria task assignment in workflow management systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1