手部掌骨、指骨骨折治疗后疗效评价

D. Chaurasia, Nirnay Pandey
{"title":"手部掌骨、指骨骨折治疗后疗效评价","authors":"D. Chaurasia, Nirnay Pandey","doi":"10.17511/ijoso.2019.i04.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Fracture and dislocation of hand most frequently encounter in orthopaedics injuries fracture of phalanges and metacarpal are approximately 10% of all fracture of skeleton system phalangeal fracture comprise 46% of hand fractures, metacarpal fractures 38% and fifth metacarpal fracture 9.7%, distal phalangeal fractures are most commonly encounter fracture of the hand. The annual incidence of phalangeal fracture in hand is 1% in normal population. And these injuries account for between. 2% and 3% of all patient visiting in accident and emergency unit thumb and middle finger are most frequently injured because they extend most distally during work activity. Aim & Objectives: To evaluate the structural and functional outcomes and the results of operative and conservative management of metacarpal and phalangeal fractures of hand. Methods: The present study comprises of 62 patients of closed fractures of metacarpal and phalanx treated in the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shyam Shah Medical College and associated Sanjay Gandhi Memorial Hospital Rewa (M.P.) in a span of two years. Evaluation of outcomes after management of metacarpal and phalangeal fractures of hand was done. Results: We achieved 24 (85.7%) excellent and good results in conservative method for metacarpal fractures and 10 (83.33%) operative methods. In Phalangeal fractures 09 (90.0%) excellent and good results were achieved in conservative method and 10 (83.34%) in operative methods. Excellent and good grip strength was noted in 53 (85.33%) cases. Single digit involvement had better TAM then multiple digits involvement. Poor results were noted in metacarpal fractures in 04 (14%) in conservative series and 02 (16.0%) in operative series. Poor results were seen in phalangeal fractures in 01 (10%) in conservative series and 02 (16.66%) in operative series. Most common complication was finger stiffness in conservative method and pin site infection in operative methods. Conclusion: Both conservative and operative methods (surgical stabilization) for metacarpal and phalangeal fractures of hand gave good functional outcomes, depending on the fracture pattern for treatment option, single digit involvement are important determinants to achieve a better grade of total active range of motion.","PeriodicalId":267909,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Update: International Journal of Surgery and Orthopedics","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of outcomes after management of metacarpal and phalangeal fractures of hand\",\"authors\":\"D. Chaurasia, Nirnay Pandey\",\"doi\":\"10.17511/ijoso.2019.i04.07\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Fracture and dislocation of hand most frequently encounter in orthopaedics injuries fracture of phalanges and metacarpal are approximately 10% of all fracture of skeleton system phalangeal fracture comprise 46% of hand fractures, metacarpal fractures 38% and fifth metacarpal fracture 9.7%, distal phalangeal fractures are most commonly encounter fracture of the hand. The annual incidence of phalangeal fracture in hand is 1% in normal population. And these injuries account for between. 2% and 3% of all patient visiting in accident and emergency unit thumb and middle finger are most frequently injured because they extend most distally during work activity. Aim & Objectives: To evaluate the structural and functional outcomes and the results of operative and conservative management of metacarpal and phalangeal fractures of hand. Methods: The present study comprises of 62 patients of closed fractures of metacarpal and phalanx treated in the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shyam Shah Medical College and associated Sanjay Gandhi Memorial Hospital Rewa (M.P.) in a span of two years. Evaluation of outcomes after management of metacarpal and phalangeal fractures of hand was done. Results: We achieved 24 (85.7%) excellent and good results in conservative method for metacarpal fractures and 10 (83.33%) operative methods. In Phalangeal fractures 09 (90.0%) excellent and good results were achieved in conservative method and 10 (83.34%) in operative methods. Excellent and good grip strength was noted in 53 (85.33%) cases. Single digit involvement had better TAM then multiple digits involvement. Poor results were noted in metacarpal fractures in 04 (14%) in conservative series and 02 (16.0%) in operative series. Poor results were seen in phalangeal fractures in 01 (10%) in conservative series and 02 (16.66%) in operative series. Most common complication was finger stiffness in conservative method and pin site infection in operative methods. Conclusion: Both conservative and operative methods (surgical stabilization) for metacarpal and phalangeal fractures of hand gave good functional outcomes, depending on the fracture pattern for treatment option, single digit involvement are important determinants to achieve a better grade of total active range of motion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":267909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical Update: International Journal of Surgery and Orthopedics\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical Update: International Journal of Surgery and Orthopedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17511/ijoso.2019.i04.07\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Update: International Journal of Surgery and Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17511/ijoso.2019.i04.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:手部骨折脱位在骨科损伤中最常见,指骨和掌骨骨折约占骨骼系统骨折的10%,指骨骨折占手部骨折的46%,掌骨骨折占38%,掌骨第五骨折占9.7%,远端指骨骨折是手部最常见的骨折。在正常人群中,手部指骨骨折的年发生率为1%。这些伤害占了。在事故和急诊部门就诊的所有病人中,有2%和3%的人拇指和中指最常受伤,因为它们在工作活动中最常向远端延伸。目的:探讨手部掌骨和指骨骨折的手术和保守治疗的结构和功能预后。方法:本研究包括在希亚姆沙阿医学院骨科和联合圣贾伊甘地纪念医院(mp)治疗的62例掌骨和指骨闭合性骨折患者。对手部掌骨、指骨骨折治疗后的疗效进行评价。结果:保守方法治疗掌骨骨折优良率24例(85.7%),手术方法10例(83.33%)。在指骨骨折中,保守方法获得优良者09例(90.0%),手术方法获得优良者10例(83.34%)。握力优良者53例(85.33%)。个位数受累的TAM比多位数受累的TAM好。保守组掌骨骨折04例(14%),手术组02例(16.0%)疗效不佳。指骨骨折保守组01例(10%),手术组02例(16.66%)疗效不佳。保守方法中最常见的并发症是手指僵硬,手术方法中最常见的并发症是针部感染。结论:手部掌骨和指骨骨折的保守和手术方法(手术稳定)均能获得良好的功能结果,根据骨折类型的治疗选择,单指受累是实现更好的总活动范围的重要决定因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of outcomes after management of metacarpal and phalangeal fractures of hand
Background: Fracture and dislocation of hand most frequently encounter in orthopaedics injuries fracture of phalanges and metacarpal are approximately 10% of all fracture of skeleton system phalangeal fracture comprise 46% of hand fractures, metacarpal fractures 38% and fifth metacarpal fracture 9.7%, distal phalangeal fractures are most commonly encounter fracture of the hand. The annual incidence of phalangeal fracture in hand is 1% in normal population. And these injuries account for between. 2% and 3% of all patient visiting in accident and emergency unit thumb and middle finger are most frequently injured because they extend most distally during work activity. Aim & Objectives: To evaluate the structural and functional outcomes and the results of operative and conservative management of metacarpal and phalangeal fractures of hand. Methods: The present study comprises of 62 patients of closed fractures of metacarpal and phalanx treated in the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shyam Shah Medical College and associated Sanjay Gandhi Memorial Hospital Rewa (M.P.) in a span of two years. Evaluation of outcomes after management of metacarpal and phalangeal fractures of hand was done. Results: We achieved 24 (85.7%) excellent and good results in conservative method for metacarpal fractures and 10 (83.33%) operative methods. In Phalangeal fractures 09 (90.0%) excellent and good results were achieved in conservative method and 10 (83.34%) in operative methods. Excellent and good grip strength was noted in 53 (85.33%) cases. Single digit involvement had better TAM then multiple digits involvement. Poor results were noted in metacarpal fractures in 04 (14%) in conservative series and 02 (16.0%) in operative series. Poor results were seen in phalangeal fractures in 01 (10%) in conservative series and 02 (16.66%) in operative series. Most common complication was finger stiffness in conservative method and pin site infection in operative methods. Conclusion: Both conservative and operative methods (surgical stabilization) for metacarpal and phalangeal fractures of hand gave good functional outcomes, depending on the fracture pattern for treatment option, single digit involvement are important determinants to achieve a better grade of total active range of motion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Comparative Study on flap necrosis following Karydakis Flap Reconstruction and Z-Plasty in Patients with Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Disease – Our experience A retrospective cohort study of diabetic foot disease during the covid pandemic in a tertiary care hospital in Kerala Corrective Osteotomy in cubitus varus deformity in children: A prospective study A prospective study of outcome of resection anastomosis in elective GI surgeries. Laparoscopic Anterior 180° Partial Fundoplication - Indian Perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1