失败背部综合征的计算机断层扫描。

Radiography today Pub Date : 1991-08-01
S Neill
{"title":"失败背部综合征的计算机断层扫描。","authors":"S Neill","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A significant number of patients complain of recurrent symptoms following lumbar spine surgery. The main differential diagnosis is between post-operative epidural fibrosis and recurrent disc protrusion. Computed tomography is generally preferred to myelography for making this distinction, not least by the patient. Intravenous contrast medium can further improve diagnostic specificity. This article reviews the practical aspects and diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography in failed back syndrome, and draws attention to the potential pitfalls and less common abnormalities which may be encountered.</p>","PeriodicalId":77602,"journal":{"name":"Radiography today","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Computed tomography in failed back syndrome.\",\"authors\":\"S Neill\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A significant number of patients complain of recurrent symptoms following lumbar spine surgery. The main differential diagnosis is between post-operative epidural fibrosis and recurrent disc protrusion. Computed tomography is generally preferred to myelography for making this distinction, not least by the patient. Intravenous contrast medium can further improve diagnostic specificity. This article reviews the practical aspects and diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography in failed back syndrome, and draws attention to the potential pitfalls and less common abnormalities which may be encountered.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77602,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiography today\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiography today\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiography today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

相当多的患者抱怨腰椎手术后症状复发。主要的鉴别诊断是术后硬膜外纤维化和复发性椎间盘突出。计算机断层扫描通常优于脊髓造影,尤其是对患者而言。静脉注射造影剂可进一步提高诊断特异性。本文回顾了计算机断层扫描在失败背部综合征中的实用方面和诊断准确性,并提请注意可能遇到的潜在陷阱和不常见的异常。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Computed tomography in failed back syndrome.

A significant number of patients complain of recurrent symptoms following lumbar spine surgery. The main differential diagnosis is between post-operative epidural fibrosis and recurrent disc protrusion. Computed tomography is generally preferred to myelography for making this distinction, not least by the patient. Intravenous contrast medium can further improve diagnostic specificity. This article reviews the practical aspects and diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography in failed back syndrome, and draws attention to the potential pitfalls and less common abnormalities which may be encountered.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The educational needs of radiotherapy patients. Clinical tuition--a new perspective. The development of protocols for trans-vaginal sonography. Experiences with contracting. A comparison of acute effects and patient acceptability of high dose rate with low dose rate after-loading in intra-vaginal radiotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1